~/Coolio Prime\~ Posted June 25, 2009 Report Share Posted June 25, 2009 I just noticed an annoying thing while creating a new card. If you plan on creating a sub-type that doesn't already exist on an effect monster you get: "*type* / *new sub-type* / Effect" which cripples the overall realism in the card. I suggest that there be a new option while selecting what kind of monster card you want to make. Sub-Type X. It makes your card Orange like an effect, but the effect part isn't added. Instead, a bar below has an area to write in what you want to go in that spot instead of effect. So, before: [Warrior / Marshmallow / Effect] After: [Warrior / Marshmallow] Just a little suggestion that'd make these cards more realistic. Also, a little post from OMG that addresses many things people keep repeating.I think its a good idea. Sure' date=' there are other ways to do it, but by that same value, there are other ways to make an entire card >_>I [i']could[/i] make my card entirely in photoshop, but thats a pain in the ass. Thus, I use the card maker. Same principle. Plus, if this site were 100% about realism, it wouldn't have the Pop culture and Other subforums. I support. [spoiler=Supporters 1-50]MeSynchro DuelistObsidianAOJJGjk233_ultimatemasterCardinalDemon Xanbumanmiragesaturn paladinjjackv2max cforce flexMystery GuestLuxordDark Armed XingOne WordNazelloOMGAKITTYmatimanywowMaj'ikTrue Madara UchihaHunterBlackwing MasterTrue Sonic FanRoxasIlikeSharksSpartanDark ForceMonkeySleepyThe God SlayerFayhaz RahamanE-Hero Shine BladmasterRakashCacneaNamoSpiredarklord33froggyboyecoboyThe Worm 55WanderleyHollywoodThe Tin TrooperSheejaWiiomiAsukaEnkoMaunlacikusMJRiku Seth001The ThanLazer YoshiDeath Bishop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crow™ Posted June 25, 2009 Report Share Posted June 25, 2009 You have my most valued support. Sounds cool.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OmegaWave Posted June 25, 2009 Report Share Posted June 25, 2009 Supported. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A●O●J Posted June 25, 2009 Report Share Posted June 25, 2009 I support Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JG. Posted June 25, 2009 Report Share Posted June 25, 2009 It's been suggested many times before, and I still support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moneypony Posted June 25, 2009 Report Share Posted June 25, 2009 It's been suggested many times before' date=' and I still support.[/quote'] And yet this one was never non-supported >_>this proves that ideas posted by more famous members get more support i don't support,this site was supposed to be used to create realistic cards,adding custom sub-types would be pointless,if you really want to make custom ones,just follow j-max's tut Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Flyer - Sakura Posted June 25, 2009 Report Share Posted June 25, 2009 I support too! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kale Posted June 25, 2009 Report Share Posted June 25, 2009 you know, there is a tut where you can copy the properties of the card, put it into a word document, find the part of the code where it says the subtype, then add in your own word, the place it in the url of your web browser, and when you hit enter it has that subtype without the /Effect on it. find it...? it should be in tuts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~/Coolio Prime\~ Posted June 25, 2009 Author Report Share Posted June 25, 2009 It's been suggested many times before' date=' and I still support.[/quote'] And yet this one was never non-supported >_>this proves that ideas posted by more famous members get more support i don't support,this site was supposed to be used to create realistic cards,adding custom sub-types would be pointless,if you really want to make custom ones,just follow j-max's tut New sub-types aren't unrealistic. New ones are implemented at various points, so they're just as subjective as archetypes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moneypony Posted June 25, 2009 Report Share Posted June 25, 2009 It's been suggested many times before' date=' and I still support.[/quote'] And yet this one was never non-supported >_>this proves that ideas posted by more famous members get more support i don't support,this site was supposed to be used to create realistic cards,adding custom sub-types would be pointless,if you really want to make custom ones,just follow j-max's tut New sub-types aren't unrealistic. New ones are implemented at various points, so they're just as subjective as archetypes. the cardmaker was supposed to replicate cards as best as possible and unless your card's subtype is real,then it isn't realistic. And i already said you can just use J-max's tut Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Çå®∂îñål Posted June 26, 2009 Report Share Posted June 26, 2009 hell yah i support Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~/Coolio Prime\~ Posted June 26, 2009 Author Report Share Posted June 26, 2009 It's been suggested many times before' date=' and I still support.[/quote'] And yet this one was never non-supported >_>this proves that ideas posted by more famous members get more support i don't support,this site was supposed to be used to create realistic cards,adding custom sub-types would be pointless,if you really want to make custom ones,just follow j-max's tut New sub-types aren't unrealistic. New ones are implemented at various points, so they're just as subjective as archetypes. the cardmaker was supposed to replicate cards as best as possible and unless your card's subtype is real,then it isn't realistic. And i already said you can just use J-max's tutYou don't get it, sub-types are allowed to be freely created just as a name and card effect can be made. As long as you follow the proper mechanic of giving them a cohesive ability and all that stuff, they're realistic. And I shouldn't have to use editors outside of a card maker to make my card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoDemonX Posted June 26, 2009 Report Share Posted June 26, 2009 I support this because I want to sub-type Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rehva Posted June 26, 2009 Report Share Posted June 26, 2009 Like the Idea I wanna Support it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Requiem Posted June 26, 2009 Report Share Posted June 26, 2009 >.> you can easily do it, like this. There is J-Max's tut. But if you can't figure it out then there should be a feature. I support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silas Angel Posted June 26, 2009 Report Share Posted June 26, 2009 Yes! ^_^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saturn of Elemia Posted June 26, 2009 Report Share Posted June 26, 2009 I SUPPORT 100 PERCENT!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stigma_Horrizone Posted June 26, 2009 Report Share Posted June 26, 2009 support Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catman25 Posted June 26, 2009 Report Share Posted June 26, 2009 I do not support, as long as you have notebook, you can easily follow J-max's, or JD's tut. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Force_Flex Posted June 26, 2009 Report Share Posted June 26, 2009 I SUPPORT 100 PERCENT!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mysty Posted June 30, 2009 Report Share Posted June 30, 2009 Mystery guest supports, even though there is another way of doing this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister Sir Posted July 1, 2009 Report Share Posted July 1, 2009 Oh, Hell. I'll support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Culpa Posted July 1, 2009 Report Share Posted July 1, 2009 Suppport >> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xing Posted July 1, 2009 Report Share Posted July 1, 2009 Xing Supports. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted July 1, 2009 Report Share Posted July 1, 2009 J-Max/JD's tut you lazy bums. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.