CrabHelmet Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 Before you post LOL GOOD CARD IS GOOD, let me say one thing: shut up. I don't want to hear it. What I do want to hear is a discussion of where this card belongs on the banlist. Go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparta™ Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 LOL GOOD CARD IS GOOD Anyways, it would probably be on Limited, that seems best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 LOL GOOD CARD IS GOOD Anyways' date=' it would probably be on Limited, that seems best.[/quote'] lolno. What is the synergy between two copies that would be shut down at one? This belongs at zero, promotes OTKs for example that recent thread in the strategy forum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted June 22, 2009 Author Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 LOL GOOD CARD IS GOOD Anyways' date=' it would probably be on Limited, that seems best.[/quote'] Fascinating. You are unable to provide any reasoning beyond "that seems best". Moron. LOL GOOD CARD IS GOOD Anyways' date=' it would probably be on Limited, that seems best.[/quote'] lolno. What is the synergy between two copies that would be shut down at one? This belongs at zero, promotes OTKs for example that recent thread in the strategy forum. That combo involves COSR, which should go to 0 anyhow. You can't blame it for comboing with banworthy cards, especially when said card is already itself central to a variety of OTKs and loops. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dragonmaster8610 Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 I think it will be semi-limited but, it might be better if it was limited. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted June 22, 2009 Author Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 I think it will be semi-limited but' date=' it might be better if it was limited.[/quote'] ATTENTION: YCM Your three posts have left me unimpressed so far. Which is exactly what I was expecting, since, you know, this is YCM, but come on, you should be able to do better than this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparta™ Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 LOL GOOD CARD IS GOOD Anyways' date=' it would probably be on Limited, that seems best.[/quote'] lolno. What is the synergy between two copies that would be shut down at one? This belongs at zero, promotes OTKs for example that recent thread in the strategy forum. No, not at zero. I guess you were right about me when I said limited, but not at zero. Maybe Semi-Limited. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 I think it will be semi-limited but' date=' it might be better if it was limited.[/quote'] It's already limited you ignorant fool. Crab I say "for example" to imply that there are OTKs besides that one. Clearly if there was only one OTK that could easily be solved with an alternative ban I wouldn't have bothered bringing the point up. It happens to not just be an integral part of several OTKs but also also assists OTKs in general by clearing the field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psycho Shocker Android Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 Here's some help it's 0 or 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 LOL GOOD CARD IS GOOD Anyways' date=' it would probably be on Limited, that seems best.[/quote'] lolno. What is the synergy between two copies that would be shut down at one? This belongs at zero, promotes OTKs for example that recent thread in the strategy forum. No, not at zero. I guess you were right about me when I said limited, but not at zero. Maybe Semi-Limited. I didn't imagine your posts would get any dumber. What synergy is there with three copies that would no longer work with two copies? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Berserker- Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 Limiting it will not decrease so much the chances of summoning it. In my non-important opinion, cards in the extra deck must be at 0 or 3 except if they are only broken when using a couple of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparta™ Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 LOL GOOD CARD IS GOOD Anyways' date=' it would probably be on Limited, that seems best.[/quote'] Fascinating. You are unable to provide any reasoning beyond "that seems best". Moron. LOL GOOD CARD IS GOOD Anyways' date=' it would probably be on Limited, that seems best.[/quote'] lolno. What is the synergy between two copies that would be shut down at one? This belongs at zero, promotes OTKs for example that recent thread in the strategy forum. That combo involves COSR, which should go to 0 anyhow. You can't blame it for comboing with banworthy cards, especially when said card is already itself central to a variety of OTKs and loops.Why the hell would I need a reason? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 Limiting it will not decrease so much the chances of summoning it. In my non-important opinion' date=' cards in the extra deck must be at 0 or 3 except if they are only broken when using a couple of them.[/quote'] One thing you missed: This also applies to cards in the main deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dragonmaster8610 Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 I think it will be semi-limited but' date=' it might be better if it was limited.[/quote'] It's already limited you ignorant fool. Crab I say "for example" to imply that there are OTKs besides that one. Clearly if there was only one OTK that could easily be solved with an alternative ban I wouldn't have bothered bringing the point up. It happens to not just be an integral part of several OTKs but also also assists OTKs in general by clearing the field. it isn't in the tcg yet so I didn't know Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 LOL GOOD CARD IS GOOD Anyways' date=' it would probably be on Limited, that seems best.[/quote'] Fascinating. You are unable to provide any reasoning beyond "that seems best". Moron. LOL GOOD CARD IS GOOD Anyways' date=' it would probably be on Limited, that seems best.[/quote'] lolno. What is the synergy between two copies that would be shut down at one? This belongs at zero, promotes OTKs for example that recent thread in the strategy forum. That combo involves COSR, which should go to 0 anyhow. You can't blame it for comboing with banworthy cards, especially when said card is already itself central to a variety of OTKs and loops.Why the hell would I need a reason?Because you're supposed to provide material for discussion when in a discussion thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Berserker- Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 Limiting it will not decrease so much the chances of summoning it. In my non-important opinion' date=' cards in the extra deck must be at 0 or 3 except if they are only broken when using a couple of them.[/quote'] One thing you missed: This also applies to cards in the main deck. No. You have to draw or find a way to search those cards first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 Limiting it will not decrease so much the chances of summoning it. In my non-important opinion' date=' cards in the extra deck must be at 0 or 3 except if they are only broken when using a couple of them.[/quote'] One thing you missed: This also applies to cards in the main deck. No. You have to draw or find a way to search those cards first. And yet the same logic applies when determining their place on the banlist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Berserker- Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 Limiting it will not decrease so much the chances of summoning it. In my non-important opinion' date=' cards in the extra deck must be at 0 or 3 except if they are only broken when using a couple of them.[/quote'] One thing you missed: This also applies to cards in the main deck. No. You have to draw or find a way to search those cards first. And yet the same logic applies when determining their place on the banlist. Well, whatever. I don't know so much. You are the YGO player; I am the one with a life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 Limiting it will not decrease so much the chances of summoning it. In my non-important opinion' date=' cards in the extra deck must be at 0 or 3 except if they are only broken when using a couple of them.[/quote'] One thing you missed: This also applies to cards in the main deck. No. You have to draw or find a way to search those cards first. And yet the same logic applies when determining their place on the banlist. Well, whatever. I don't know so much. You are the YGO player; I am the one with a life. Wow i didn't know discussing things on a discussion forum meant I didn't have a life. I guess the point isn't to discuss but to make ignorant statements and then insult when they are shown to be such. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psycho Shocker Android Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 We were searching for another OTK with brionac. He works in the junk synchron/tuningware magical explosion deck. He's the one emptying your hand and clearing the field to make sure the OTK goes through. The fact his effect isn't limited to "X" use(s) per turn is a major flaw of conception. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Earthbound Ojamortal! Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 Will This Come out in TCG? Me Hope so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smeg Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 Personally I think it should be banned.Having a level 9 sycnhro only increases the toolbox.And also the fact that broniac is broken. That helps to. Now you can just dump a mali and e-tele a psy comander for a insta-broniac. How easy.It would sure be fun at noob-swarm-decks that take 3 turns to get 5 monsters. :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Docomodake Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 Personally I think it should be banned.Having a level 9 sycnhro only increases the toolbox.And also the fact that broniac is broken. That helps to. Now you can just dump a mali and e-tele a psy comander for a insta-broniac. How easy.It would sure be fun at noob-swarm-decks that take 3 turns to get 5 monsters. :D This is probably the dumbest post you've ever made ever. Brionac is a level 6. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 Personally I think it should be banned.Having a level 9 sycnhro only increases the toolbox.And also the fact that broniac is broken. That helps to. Now you can just dump a mali and e-tele a psy comander for a insta-broniac. How easy.It would sure be fun at noob-swarm-decks that take 3 turns to get 5 monsters. :D This is probably the dumbest post you've ever made ever. Brionac is a level 6. He gave a wrong example, but his statement is valid. Brionac is insanely easy to summon. You jst summon Kitty and you are done. And it makes no sensne to limit him. You don't need to draw him and you need only 1 for an OTK. He must be banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkillzKill Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 Card should be banned. This card is the reason for the banning of Premature Burial, and is a Snipe Hunter that never misses (nor destroys, but sending back to hand is better in some cases), therefore promotes OTKs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.