Plaguespreader Zombie Posted June 21, 2009 Report Share Posted June 21, 2009 [align=center]V1V2V3An open invatation to tell me how much I suckCnC.[/align] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rise of the Eldrazi Posted June 21, 2009 Report Share Posted June 21, 2009 2nd one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister Sir Posted June 21, 2009 Report Share Posted June 21, 2009 2nd one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plaguespreader Zombie Posted June 21, 2009 Author Report Share Posted June 21, 2009 CnC or GTFO. Bump. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Shore Posted June 21, 2009 Report Share Posted June 21, 2009 Good gawd, I guess I have to go through this again. The stock in the first one is so hawt, so why did you have to use a render that fails so much with it.The second one could have been a better tag if you had used a better fitting render, but you didn't, so now it's just an OK tag that is way too simple. The render itself doesn't have much depth around it, all the depth comes from the stock, which is virtually unused because of the render placement.The third is like the second but messier. However, it helps a bit with the flow and blend and is slightly more interesting. Execution could be way better on all 3. It started off broken. You'd have been better off starting over instead of trying to fix it as is. I still what that stock though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plaguespreader Zombie Posted June 21, 2009 Author Report Share Posted June 21, 2009 Good gawd' date=' I guess I have to go through this again. The stock in the first one is so hawt, so why did you have to use a render that fails so much with it. [b']Because no other render I could find fit it?[/b]The second one could have been a better tag if you had used a better fitting render, but you didn't, so now it's just an OK tag that is way too simple. The render itself doesn't have much depth around it, all the depth comes from the stock, which is virtually unused because of the render placement. This reminds me of my talk with Haseo. Tell me how I can fix it, instead of telling me what's wrong. M'kay?The third is like the second but messier. However, it helps a bit with the flow and blend and is slightly more interesting. Execution could be way better on all 3. Read above It started off broken. You'd have been better off starting over instead of trying to fix it as is. I still what that stock though. What does you what that stock mean? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Shore Posted June 21, 2009 Report Share Posted June 21, 2009 Good gawd' date=' I guess I have to go through this again. The stock in the first one is so hawt, so why did you have to use a render that fails so much with it. [b']Because no other render I could find fit it?[/b]Then look harder. Something floating in the air does not fit the street motif. At least try something that walks, preferably facing the viewer, as that is the direction that the street naturally gives the flow. You shouldn't fight the natural flow of the stock. If you're gonna use a stock, go with its natural advantagesThe second one could have been a better tag if you had used a better fitting render, but you didn't, so now it's just an OK tag that is way too simple. The render itself doesn't have much depth around it, all the depth comes from the stock, which is virtually unused because of the render placement. This reminds me of my talk with Haseo. Tell me how I can fix it, instead of telling me what's wrong. M'kay?As I said, its all in the render. You just have to take the time or make a request in order to get a better one. The render kills it because your fighting the flow. You successfully created your own flow, virtually negating the stock, but it's boring. It's not creative, because it's a one directional, random flow, that doesn't match the stock and throws the concept and the composition way off. You need to think of these things before randomly pasting a render on a stock. I can't tell you how to fix this tag because, with this render, it's a lost cause. Even if you build around the render, the stock will be pointless. The only advice I can give you is scrap it and find either a better render or a stock that matches your current render better. The ghastly render is hard to work with since it doesn't have much natural flow and on top of it all is floating. Idk if a stock tag would really suit it. The third is like the second but messier. However, it helps a bit with the flow and blend and is slightly more interesting. Execution could be way better on all 3. Read above It started off broken. You'd have been better off starting over instead of trying to fix it as is. I still what that stock though. What does you what that stock mean?Oh sorry, I meant I want the stock Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plaguespreader Zombie Posted June 21, 2009 Author Report Share Posted June 21, 2009 Good gawd' date=' I guess I have to go through this again. The stock in the first one is so hawt, so why did you have to use a render that fails so much with it. [b']Because no other render I could find fit it?[/b]Then look harder. Something floating in the air does not fit the street motif. At least try something that walks, preferably facing the viewer, as that is the direction that the street naturally gives the flow. You shouldn't fight the natural flow of the stock. If you're gonna use a stock, go with its natural advantages Walking: Tried it, I couldn't make it fit in with the tag. =\ And even if I could I'd have to center it. I tried a Gengar render like you suggested, but it was to LQ. =\ Alright I'll scrap it and start over.The second one could have been a better tag if you had used a better fitting render, but you didn't, so now it's just an OK tag that is way too simple. The render itself doesn't have much depth around it, all the depth comes from the stock, which is virtually unused because of the render placement. This reminds me of my talk with Haseo. Tell me how I can fix it, instead of telling me what's wrong. M'kay?As I said, its all in the render. You just have to take the time or make a request in order to get a better one. The render kills it because your fighting the flow. You successfully created your own flow, virtually negating the stock, but it's boring. It's not creative, because it's a one directional, random flow, that doesn't match the stock and throws the concept and the composition way off. You need to think of these things before randomly pasting a render on a stock. I can't tell you how to fix this tag because, with this render, it's a lost cause. Even if you build around the render, the stock will be pointless. The only advice I can give you is scrap it and find either a better render or a stock that matches your current render better. The ghastly render is hard to work with since it doesn't have much natural flow and on top of it all is floating. Idk if a stock tag would really suit it. ok.The third is like the second but messier. However, it helps a bit with the flow and blend and is slightly more interesting. Execution could be way better on all 3. Read above It started off broken. You'd have been better off starting over instead of trying to fix it as is. I still what that stock though. What does you what that stock mean?Oh sorry, I meant I want the stock Ah, ask haris. =/ He gave it to me. I'm not sure if I'm aloud to redistribute it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prada Posted June 21, 2009 Report Share Posted June 21, 2009 Good gawd' date=' I guess I have to go through this again. The stock in the first one is so hawt, so why did you have to use a render that fails so much with it. [b']Because no other render I could find fit it?[/b]Then look harder. Something floating in the air does not fit the street motif. At least try something that walks, preferably facing the viewer, as that is the direction that the street naturally gives the flow. You shouldn't fight the natural flow of the stock. If you're gonna use a stock, go with its natural advantages Walking: Tried it, I couldn't make it fit in with the tag. =\ And even if I could I'd have to center it. I tried a Gengar render like you suggested, but it was to LQ. =\ Alright I'll scrap it and start over. Bish, SO many renders could have fit this tag. A render of Altair or some shiz would have worked perfectly. You could use the render of Ghastly by sizing it down then placing him somewhere nice in the background to fit in a better concept. =P You just aren't looking hard enough. PM me the stock. Most likely Haris got it fom PB or Bing or something. He didn't create it. =P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harhar Posted June 21, 2009 Report Share Posted June 21, 2009 Good gawd' date=' I guess I have to go through this again. The stock in the first one is so hawt, so why did you have to use a render that fails so much with it. [b']Because no other render I could find fit it?[/b]Then look harder. Something floating in the air does not fit the street motif. At least try something that walks, preferably facing the viewer, as that is the direction that the street naturally gives the flow. You shouldn't fight the natural flow of the stock. If you're gonna use a stock, go with its natural advantages Walking: Tried it, I couldn't make it fit in with the tag. =\ And even if I could I'd have to center it. I tried a Gengar render like you suggested, but it was to LQ. =\ Alright I'll scrap it and start over. Bish, SO many renders could have fit this tag. A render of Altair or some shiz would have worked perfectly. You could use the render of Ghastly by sizing it down then placing him somewhere nice in the background to fit in a better concept. =P You just aren't looking hard enough. PM me the stock. Most likely Haris got it fom PB or Bing or something. He didn't create it. =P I didn't create it but I still found it ;DI was the one who gave the stocks to Xirno so if you want them you still have to ask.You aren't an exception. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Shore Posted June 21, 2009 Report Share Posted June 21, 2009 Wait, ask you or Xirno? I'm asking both of you =p pwease Hawis? pwease Xiwno? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harhar Posted June 21, 2009 Report Share Posted June 21, 2009 Wait' date=' ask you or Xirno? I'm asking both of you =p pwease Hawis? pwease Xiwno?[/quote'] Xirno will send it to you ^-^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prada Posted June 21, 2009 Report Share Posted June 21, 2009 I didn't create it but I still found it ;D I asked in mah own special way.I was the one who gave the stocks to Xirno so if you want them you still have to ask. I did. =P You aren't an exception. Dun talk to me that way' date=' bish. >=O[/b'] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Shore Posted June 21, 2009 Report Share Posted June 21, 2009 Wait' date=' ask you or Xirno? I'm asking both of you =p pwease Hawis? pwease Xiwno?[/quote'] Xirno will send it to you ^-^=3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.