Argentum Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 The glads F***ed me over at regionals with a 2-3 record....the rounds I lost were so gay. I claim to have lost only one of those due to lack of skill and that was in the mirror match. Other than that round I was basically put into the worst situations possible with glads. Both samnites in the grave and a rescue cat in hand or both samnites in hand with a summoner monk and no spells. WTF Anyway when your deck does that to you its time to move on. Monsters:Beast King Barbaros x3Mystic Tomato x2Destiny Hero - Fear MongerDestiny Hero - DasherKrebons x2Dark GrepherSanganDestiny Hero - Defender x2Phantom Dragon x2Elemental Hero Stratos Spells:Monster RebornReinforcement of the ArmyNobleman of ExterminationGiant TrunadeBrain ControlHeavy StormMystical Space TyphoonSmashing Ground Traps:Skill Drain x3Solemn Judgment x3PWWB x3Trap DustshootTorrential Tribute This deck isn't even close to finished. I still need to trade for some D-Draws and allures and some malicious and a DAD and some other stuff....lol but yeah tell me if its a good rough draft. It beat a deck that came in top 16 at regionals in SC. So the rough draft can't be that bad. What it will look like when I'm done. Monsters: 18Beast King Barbaros x2Mystic Tomato x2Destiny Hero - Fear MongerKrebons x2Psychic CommanderDestiny Hero - malicious x2Dark GrepherDark Armed DragonSanganDestiny Hero - Defender Plaguespreader ZombiePhantom Dragon x2Elemental Hero Stratos Spells: 12Destiny Draw x2Allure of Darkness x2Monster RebornReinforcement of the ArmyGiant TrunadeBrain ControlHeavy StormMystical Space TyphoonSmashing GroundEmergency Teleport Traps: 11Skill Drain x3Solemn Judgment x3PWWB x3Trap DustshootTorrential Tribute Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueEyesShiningDragon4Z Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 could you tell me what exsactly you r going for with this deck, not really sure at the moment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argentum Posted June 8, 2009 Author Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 Its basically dark skill drain, which is naturally anti-meta. Grepher dumps dasher and plagueDefender + Skill drain = lolBarbaros + Skill drain = lol When I get some Malicious and an e-tele I'll be able to synchro out the ass....just a basic skill drain thats anti-meta. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tronta Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 glads take no skill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argentum Posted June 8, 2009 Author Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 glads take no skill. To know which one to take out at what time...yeah its a big deal. If the glads don't take skill then I don't know what does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueEyesShiningDragon4Z Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 Its basically dark skill drain' date=' which is naturally anti-meta. Grepher dumps dasher and plagueDefender + Skill drain = lolBarbaros + Skill drain = lol When I get some Malicious and an e-tele I'll be able to synchro out the ass....just a basic skill drain thats anti-meta.[/quote'] ah okwell i personaly dont care for phantom dragon, it isnt very good but i can see some advantage using it with skill drainanyways if your going to use DAD then you could use some more grave control so pot of avarice and foolish would be good for that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 glads take no skill. If you mean they take no skill to build then yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argentum Posted June 8, 2009 Author Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 ah okwell i personaly dont care for phantom dragon' date=' it isnt very good but i can see some advantage using it with skill drainanyways if your going to use DAD then you could use some more grave control so pot of avarice and foolish would be good for that[/quote'] So you are saying that I'm going to have 8 darks in the grave? WTF?Foolish is too slow. I already have grepher for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.net Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 Forbidden Chalice? Idk, really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argentum Posted June 8, 2009 Author Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 glads take no skill. If you mean they take no skill to build then yes. But every meta deck is basically the same. 5 card differences between builds tops. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tronta Posted June 9, 2009 Report Share Posted June 9, 2009 they dont take skill to play either.its a scripted deck.from the moment you draw your starting hand, everything you are going to do is laid out already. they take even less skill to build though, and that bothers me. pc is the only deck build thats creative and innovative in this meta.unless im missing one.ls and gb are scripted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argentum Posted June 9, 2009 Author Report Share Posted June 9, 2009 Forbidden Chalice? Idk' date=' really.[/quote'] Nah, Whats the point of it? I'm not running the inconsistent skill drain build with 3 barbaros and 3 fusilier. they dont take skill to play either.its a scripted deck.from the moment you draw your starting hand' date=' everything you are going to do is laid out already. they take even less skill to build though, and that bothers me. pc is the only deck build thats creative and innovative in this meta.unless im missing one.ls and gb are scripted.[/quote'] I take the whole idea of glads take no skill to play as an insult.The deck is a make shiz up as you go along deck not a scripted one. There are so many options.Do I set the chariot or the bottomless or both? If its the first turn or even the third that one decision can change the outcome of the entire game. What if they have a heavy storm in hand? There were three glad players that I met at regionals. Two were best friends and one took top eight.ALL of our builds were different. Top 8 Ran andal and no prisma...and main decked a waboku and no monkThe other two didn't main deck retiari and ran 3 e-consThere was one guy there with 3 hoplomus, 3 waboku, 3 book, 3 e-con, 3 chariot....super defensive. You get the idea. BIG differences in playstyle. Glads are very versatile not only as a toolbox, but in playstyle. So when you say glads are easy to build. You are obviously misinformed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tronta Posted June 9, 2009 Report Share Posted June 9, 2009 ok see, thats like saying choosing to run 1 jain or 2 is variation. maybe i needed to rephrase my argument:the meta gbs take no skill to run or build.any jank can run 3 secutor and test ape and think hes amazing, that doesnt mean his deck is good. doesnt matter how variated it is. nor does it make it innovative.the simple truth is that the gb tool box is a broken affair that consists of 4 basic choices:beater, divine wrath, monarch or lockdown beater.usually the last 2 are used.mostly the 3rd.funking gyzarus.its not an ingenious deck that takes strategy and thought. its a simplistic toolbox that says: how quickly do you want to blow up the field? last, knowing which trap to set when isnt the exclusive domain of gbs.that applies to /all/ decks. its an invalid argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Static Posted June 9, 2009 Report Share Posted June 9, 2009 I take the whole idea of glads take no skill to play as an insult.The deck is a make shiz up as you go along deck not a scripted one. There are so many options.Do I set the chariot or the bottomless or both? If its the first turn or even the third that one decision can change the outcome of the entire game. What if they have a heavy storm in hand? There were three glad players that I met at regionals. Two were best friends and one took top eight.ALL of our builds were different. Top 8 Ran andal and no prisma...and main decked a waboku and no monkThe other two didn't main deck retiari and ran 3 e-consThere was one guy there with 3 hoplomus' date=' 3 waboku, 3 book, 3 e-con, 3 chariot....super defensive. You get the idea. BIG differences in playstyle. Glads are very versatile not only as a toolbox, but in playstyle. So when you say glads are easy to build. You are obviously misinformed.[/quote'] I thought they made a ruling that makes Waboku not let you swap your glads. But on topic; the only change I would make is dropping PWWB for bottomless, I'm not a fan of discarding for anything, but your final draft build is solid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argentum Posted June 10, 2009 Author Report Share Posted June 10, 2009 ok see' date=' thats like saying choosing to run 1 jain or 2 is variation. maybe i needed to rephrase my argument:the [u']meta[/u] gbs take no skill to run or build.any jank can run 3 secutor and test ape and think hes amazing, that doesnt mean his deck is good. doesnt matter how variated it is. nor does it make it innovative.the simple truth is that the gb tool box is a broken affair that consists of 4 basic choices:beater, divine wrath, monarch or lockdown beater.usually the last 2 are used.mostly the 3rd.f***ing gyzarus.its not an ingenious deck that takes strategy and thought. its a simplistic toolbox that says: how quickly do you want to blow up the field? last, knowing which trap to set when isnt the exclusive domain of gbs.that applies to /all/ decks. its an invalid argument. Glads aren't even near broken. Everything in glads can be played around. Chariot is the easiest thing to get around. I learned that the hard way at Regionals when I went f***ing 2-3... PLUS once you lose control of the game. Its damn near impossible to come back. Stupid top decks are garbage. No not all decks. No other deck has to deal with chariot or bottomless. When you don't draw a solemn in the first turn glads is a serious mind game. Other decks don't have card variations like glads. All they usually will set are solemn and another base trap that the person prefers...which is usually bottomless or threatening roar or crush card or something. I take the whole idea of glads take no skill to play as an insult.The deck is a make shiz up as you go along deck not a scripted one. There are so many options.Do I set the chariot or the bottomless or both? If its the first turn or even the third that one decision can change the outcome of the entire game. What if they have a heavy storm in hand? There were three glad players that I met at regionals. Two were best friends and one took top eight.ALL of our builds were different. Top 8 Ran andal and no prisma...and main decked a waboku and no monkThe other two didn't main deck retiari and ran 3 e-consThere was one guy there with 3 hoplomus' date=' 3 waboku, 3 book, 3 e-con, 3 chariot....super defensive. You get the idea. BIG differences in playstyle. Glads are very versatile not only as a toolbox, but in playstyle. So when you say glads are easy to build. You are obviously misinformed.[/quote'] I thought they made a ruling that makes Waboku not let you swap your glads. But on topic; the only change I would make is dropping PWWB for bottomless, I'm not a fan of discarding for anything, but your final draft build is solid. Glads can still swap on it. Someone lied to you. I need PWWB to dump the malicious and other d-heros for fear monger + plague + provides a bit of grave control. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.