Guest KAJN Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 Made with gimp. PSD/XCF/TUTORIAL will be available. So if you lazy fücks (none is yet) wanna bash it & say, the sig fails because you made it with gimp. I will neg rep you, report you & have you banned for flaming.Forget the neg rep part.I have better results from the same steps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harhar Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 The c4d at the left ruins it imho.Text wouldn't have been cooler if you moved it down a bit.The blurred c4d just doesn't look like it belongs. I understand it's for depth but it just doesn't look right, to me anyway.But, this is better than the other Gimp stuff you see now a days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest KAJN Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 The c4d at the left ruins it imho.Text wouldn't have been cooler if you moved it down a bit.The blurred c4d just doesn't look like it belongs. I understand it's for depth but it just doesn't look right' date=' to me anyway.But, this is better than the other Gimp stuff you see now a days.[/quote'] Just a correction.Blurring helps depth. It's not part of depth. Also I thought making them all the same colors would make then part of each other. Still, again, I have better outcomes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hioco Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 Sig fails. You used GIMP. Lol joking. This is actually the best thing I have ever seen made with GIMP. Excellent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest KAJN Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 Thanks mate.Glad to see you showing up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seta Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 =O You just pwnd with GIMP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehmani Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 The best thing I have ever seen made with GIMP. Agreed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hobbes96 Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 i refuse to believe this is gimp.it is definately the best gimp o have seenyour eyes kinda want to focus on the bright stuff on the right of the render though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skyfi Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 Gimp + Omni > Photoshop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest KAJN Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 i refuse to believe this is gimp.it is definately the best gimp o have seenyour eyes kinda want to focus on the bright stuff on the right of the render though Thanks mate.I'll try to focus on the focal rather than the details & effects next time I guess. Gimp + Omni > Photoshop. xD' date=' still need practice though.[/size'] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tefached Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 i don't like the left corner. but then again, i haven't made any gfx in forever so what do i know....i fail. you pwn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest KAJN Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 i don't like the left corner. but then again' date=' i haven't made any gfx in forever so what do i know....i fail. you pwn.[/quote'] Nah mate. I executed the whole tag a bit wrong.The left could be hell lot improved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hobbes96 Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 on the very right of the render, is that a blurred c4d? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest KAJN Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 I think so since it's behind the focal so yeah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hobbes96 Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 i mean the brownish purple thing in front of the render Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest KAJN Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 No, that's a bubble C4D effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hobbes96 Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 yeah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest KAJN Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 Lol!Yeah it is xD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huntar! Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 love this. ;D can't wait for the xcf. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JoshIcy Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 i refuse to believe this is gimp. Lol. Someone needs to be educated more.GIMP can do anything PS can, aside from the Ripple Filter and a great gradient map, and HTML Slicer. Aside from that, it can. Just takes a little more steps... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest KAJN Posted May 26, 2009 Report Share Posted May 26, 2009 i refuse to believe this is gimp. Lol. Someone needs to be educated more.GIMP can do anything PS can' date=' aside from the Ripple Filter and a great gradient map, and HTML Slicer. Aside from that, it can. Just takes a little more steps...[/quote'] I OBJECT! Gimp is exactly like PS. It has Gradient map mate.They are just hard to find. The thing that pisses me off is that it doesn't have grouping >.> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seta Posted May 26, 2009 Report Share Posted May 26, 2009 i refuse to believe this is gimp. Lol. Someone needs to be educated more.GIMP can do anything PS can' date=' aside from the Ripple Filter and a great gradient map, and HTML Slicer. Aside from that, it can. Just takes a little more steps...[/quote'] I OBJECT! Gimp is exactly like PS. It has Gradient map mate.They are just hard to find. The thing that pisses me off is that it doesn't have grouping >.> I don't think finding Gradient Map in GIMP is hard D: And yes, it doesn't have grouping. Well, I pretty much never used it on PS =P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harhar Posted May 26, 2009 Report Share Posted May 26, 2009 i refuse to believe this is gimp. Lol. Someone needs to be educated more.GIMP can do anything PS can' date=' aside from the Ripple Filter and a great gradient map, and HTML Slicer. Aside from that, it can. Just takes a little more steps...[/quote'] I OBJECT! Gimp is exactly like PS. It has Gradient map mate.They are just hard to find. The thing that pisses me off is that it doesn't have grouping >.> How does Gimp "Apply Image"?I've always wanted to know that =/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seta Posted May 26, 2009 Report Share Posted May 26, 2009 i refuse to believe this is gimp. Lol. Someone needs to be educated more.GIMP can do anything PS can' date=' aside from the Ripple Filter and a great gradient map, and HTML Slicer. Aside from that, it can. Just takes a little more steps...[/quote'] I OBJECT! Gimp is exactly like PS. It has Gradient map mate.They are just hard to find. The thing that pisses me off is that it doesn't have grouping >.> How does Gimp "Apply Image"?I've always wanted to know that =/ Layers>New from visible =P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harhar Posted May 26, 2009 Report Share Posted May 26, 2009 i refuse to believe this is gimp. Lol. Someone needs to be educated more.GIMP can do anything PS can' date=' aside from the Ripple Filter and a great gradient map, and HTML Slicer. Aside from that, it can. Just takes a little more steps...[/quote'] I OBJECT! Gimp is exactly like PS. It has Gradient map mate.They are just hard to find. The thing that pisses me off is that it doesn't have grouping >.> How does Gimp "Apply Image"?I've always wanted to know that =/ Layers>New from visible =P Oh =oI still prefer Photoshops simpler method =P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.