JG. Posted May 30, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 30, 2009 Thank you. Now make ZenQued believe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seta Posted May 30, 2009 Report Share Posted May 30, 2009 Well, it is a possible rip, but depends. I should see the .xcf first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adama. Posted May 30, 2009 Report Share Posted May 30, 2009 Well, it's definitely possible it could work either way. Why .Rainbow.Nature. would want to theme his account around a ripped piece is beyond me, it would be absurdly risky. However, by the same token, why an experienced GFXer would make an outcome that looks almost exactly like the tut and then post it is also suspicious and stupid. Even if he did make it, he should have known better than to post it, since he should know the members he is dealing with here, and should know that one of them would find the tut and accuse him of ripping. Also, a lot of his excuses seem extremely convenient. For example, if he got the new laptop, it would make more sense to install photoshop, since I highly doubt that a company would include GIMP with their computer. However, for some reason, he gets GIMP first, which is a lazy excuse for why the tut is GIMP. However, he could have just downloaded GIMP to make the result he wanted from a GIMP tut. Whether its a rip or a misunderstanding, it seems that .Rainbow.Nature made some very unintelligent choices with his presentation of the piece and the truth behind it. Good luck with the investigation.{Adama} Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JG. Posted May 30, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 30, 2009 Just ask bud. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seta Posted May 30, 2009 Report Share Posted May 30, 2009 ... 1+ rep for joo, Adama. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JG. Posted May 30, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 30, 2009 Well' date=' it's definitely possible it could work either way. Why .Rainbow.Nature. would want to theme his account around a ripped piece is beyond me, it would be absurdly risky. However, by the same token, why an experienced GFXer would make an outcome that looks almost exactly like the tut and then post it is also suspicious and stupid. Even if he did make it, he should have known better than to post it, since he should know the members he is dealing with here, and should know that one of them would find the tut and accuse him of ripping. Also, a lot of his excuses seem extremely convenient. For example, if he got the new laptop, it would make more sense to install photoshop, since I highly doubt that a company would include GIMP with their computer. However, for some reason, he gets GIMP first, which is a lazy excuse for why the tut is GIMP. However, he could have just downloaded GIMP to make the result he wanted from a GIMP tut. Whether its a rip or a misunderstanding, it seems that .Rainbow.Nature made some very unintelligent choices with his presentation of the piece and the truth behind it. Good luck with the investigation.{Adama}[/quote'] Call me JG. And anyways, I will keep telling you: I didn't rip! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soul Legacy Posted May 30, 2009 Report Share Posted May 30, 2009 Thank you. Now make ZenQued believe. I'll try, but that will be hard seeing as hes a **** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JG. Posted May 30, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 30, 2009 Thank you. Now make ZenQued believe. I'll try' date=' but that will be hard seeing as hes a ****[/quote'] Agreed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Shore Posted May 30, 2009 Report Share Posted May 30, 2009 is the word that's starred out b!tch or d!ck? My money's on the phallus :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JG. Posted May 30, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 30, 2009 Count the number of stars and try work it out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Shore Posted May 30, 2009 Report Share Posted May 30, 2009 bich? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soul Legacy Posted May 30, 2009 Report Share Posted May 30, 2009 bich? Yes. Look, i don't hate you, your an awsome dude. But sometimes you can just get that too annoying that i will call you that, but in the end, i don't really hate you, and don't plan on giving you NEG's anytime soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JG. Posted May 30, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 30, 2009 Whereas I don't plan anymore, as I've already done it. But for now, let's leave this alone and let Blood Rose or someone else decide this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Shore Posted May 30, 2009 Report Share Posted May 30, 2009 BR never remade the original rip court 0.o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JG. Posted May 30, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 30, 2009 Omni tried once, but it failed. Just PM BR if you want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoex Posted May 30, 2009 Report Share Posted May 30, 2009 Call me JG. And anyways' date=' I will keep telling you: [b']I didn't rip[/b]! [spoiler= PMing with JG] Now, after you have my screen shot lets look at this: "Copying is plagiarism when: * Anyone copies parts or all of someone else’s concept, artwork, or design and uses it as their own without citing the source." - http://arc.academyart.edu/writing/plagiarism.asp Also what you did is practically plagiarism except its not with words, but with art. The two pieces of art look almost identical and if I was just scrolling past them I would say they look the same. Maybe your not completely sure about what plagiarism/ripping/ Actually is, but this IS plagiarism even if it is made from scratch. DEAL WITH IT. ____________________________ >.> Alright this is all I'm willing to write right now. I'm going to sleep, see what happens to this when I wake up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smeg Posted May 30, 2009 Report Share Posted May 30, 2009 Snoex wins.[/fact] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JG. Posted May 30, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 30, 2009 Yes, but I can still not be accused of ripping, since it is still from scratch. But agreed, Snoex just owned me and my thread, no denying it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest KAJN Posted May 30, 2009 Report Share Posted May 30, 2009 Look even if you neg me I don't give a funk. It's a reputation not something that would make me cry.The bird is rendered the same. Flowers are the same place. Brushes look the same with just some other brushes added. & then you've added some new shapes. [/RIP] Thank you & stop ripping please. We'll leave it to BR to decide. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SushiTheLegend Posted May 30, 2009 Report Share Posted May 30, 2009 To prevent this going any further I'm locking this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.