abovelife Posted May 16, 2009 Report Share Posted May 16, 2009 Whats worse getting shot (.22)or gettin shot by an bow-an-arrow Id say they both suck i cant pick lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moneypony Posted May 16, 2009 Report Share Posted May 16, 2009 None,people not posting these types of threads in the polls section is worse Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larxene Posted May 16, 2009 Report Share Posted May 16, 2009 I wouldn't know, I've never been shot by either of them. I highly doubt that they would be very fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marly Posted May 16, 2009 Report Share Posted May 16, 2009 I'm sure it depends on what kind of bow and arrow, since I doubt getting hit with those plastic ones you find at the 99 cent store would cause any serious physical damage. Also, as Moneypony stated, this belongs in Polls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Shore Posted May 16, 2009 Report Share Posted May 16, 2009 it depends. If someone took a really good shot and killed you instantly, neither would be worse. If some dumbass shot you in the gut and watched your innards bleed and fall out, I would say the gun would be worse since it does a lot of damage in there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dweller of Parables Posted May 16, 2009 Report Share Posted May 16, 2009 Noobs.Rape is better. :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Fake Apology Posted May 16, 2009 Report Share Posted May 16, 2009 The most suitable forum for this thread would be 'Polls'. Anyway, I don't know which one could hurt you or damage you the most, but I guess both would generally inflict a slightly big damage(but not equal). So I vote 'Both'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dweller of Parables Posted May 16, 2009 Report Share Posted May 16, 2009 The most suitable forum for this thread would be 'Polls'.No one gives a cr@p. :)~Love YCM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shrekstasy Posted May 16, 2009 Report Share Posted May 16, 2009 Neither. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soul Legacy Posted May 16, 2009 Report Share Posted May 16, 2009 Noobs.Poison is better. :P ~ Fixed. anyway: Neither. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Emo~ Posted May 16, 2009 Report Share Posted May 16, 2009 Getting shot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Light Flash Posted May 16, 2009 Report Share Posted May 16, 2009 Neither. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abovelife Posted May 17, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 None' date='people not posting these types of threads in the polls section is worse[/quote']YOUR STUPID LOLI wouldn't know' date=' I've never been shot by either of them. I highly doubt that they would be very fun.[/quote'] very true i just wanted to see what people said though lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 depends on the situation, whichever gives you the slower and more painful death (assuming it is fatal) is the worse of the two Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kotaro Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 I say both Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
╬「Selatcia」╬ Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 I voted for "Both". As the above posts stated, it depends on the situation you're in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rakesh Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 I voted for "Both". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The kid with the face Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 ...Which ever one kills me? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:|Fallen|:. Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 i vote the guy who made the god damn thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amethyst Phoenix Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 Getting shot wouldn't hurt as much and would not be as complicated to heal. A .22 is an incredibly weak bullet, but it can still be fatal if it connects with the heart/lungs or your head. Any gun, even a .22, has a larger amount of force in it's projectile than any bow. Lets assume for now that it's just a muscle mass we're talking about. Not a vital organ. And the arrow in question is going to be a broadhead. The arrow would be much worse. The bullet would simply pass through you entirely, or stop at a bone or in a particularly thick section of muscle. It would essentially be just a small area that was pierced straight through. The arrow, however, would lacerate everything in a much wider radius. It would slice important tendons and ligaments, in addition to causing massive blood loss. The extraction of the arrow would be much messier, as the blades of the head would slice the area more while being removed. This could become incredibly complicated if the arrow were to break at some point. God forbid the shot person panics and pulls the arrow out right then, shredding the inside of the wound and allowing the blood to pour out of the wound. So, the bow and arrow would be much worse, causing more damage, more pain, and with a larger risk and number of potential complications. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crystal Beast 123 Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 Both would majorly suck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 yeah but whichever does less damage is the lesser of the two evils Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abovelife Posted May 17, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 pretty much it depends how slow u would die and where u got shot but like everyone esle says they both suck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amethyst Phoenix Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 I already posted the details why, but, once again, the answer is the arrow >_> Anywhere that the bullet would be fatal, the arrow would also be fatal. Anywhere else, the arrow would cause a worse wound. I've done this stuff in reality, I know what I'm talking about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abovelife Posted May 17, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 I already posted the details why' date=' but, once again, the answer is the arrow >_> Anywhere that the bullet would be fatal, the arrow would also be fatal. Anywhere else, the arrow would cause a worse wound. I've done this stuff in reality, I know what I'm talking about.[/quote'] ur right i guess........... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.