El Majishan Posted May 14, 2009 Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 Ok so we all know Stratos is a pretty cool dude, but does he really deserve to be at 1? I think he should be at 2....simply because I wanna run 2 8) But really, is he that good that he sould be at 1? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanAtlus Posted May 14, 2009 Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 Ok so we all know Stratos is a pretty cool dude' date=' but does he really deserve to be at 1? I think he should be at 2....simply because I wanna run 2 8) But really, is he that good that he sould be at 1?[/quote'] Oh Certainly.Rota should also be at three.[/sarcasm] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted May 14, 2009 Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 Ok so we all know Stratos is a pretty cool dude' date=' but does he really deserve to be at 1? I think he should be at 2....simply because I wanna run 2 8) But really, is he that good that he sould be at 1?[/quote'] Oh Certainly.Rota should also be at three.[/sarcasm] See, this is why I call you Rook-kun. Actually, I don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Majishan Posted May 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 Ok so we all know Stratos is a pretty cool dude' date=' but does he really deserve to be at 1? I think he should be at 2....simply because I wanna run 2 8) But really, is he that good that he sould be at 1?[/quote'] Oh Certainly.Rota should also be at three.[/sarcasm] :roll: sarcasm is not needed. and speaking of rota it was fine it two and should always be at 2. one is jus retarded Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted May 14, 2009 Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 Ok so we all know Stratos is a pretty cool dude' date=' but does he really deserve to be at 1? I think he should be at 2....simply because I wanna run 2 8) But really, is he that good that he sould be at 1?[/quote'] Oh Certainly.Rota should also be at three.[/sarcasm] :roll: sarcasm is not needed. and speaking of rota it was fine it two and should always be at 2. one is jus retarded NO UR RETADED! There's nothing wrong with Rota at three, it's just a basic +0 that gives warriors some flexibility. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Majishan Posted May 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 Ok so we all know Stratos is a pretty cool dude' date=' but does he really deserve to be at 1? I think he should be at 2....simply because I wanna run 2 8) But really, is he that good that he sould be at 1?[/quote'] Oh Certainly.Rota should also be at three.[/sarcasm] :roll: sarcasm is not needed. and speaking of rota it was fine it two and should always be at 2. one is jus retarded NO UR RETADED! There's nothing wrong with Rota at three, it's just a basic +0 that gives warriors some flexibility. warrior toolbox already has enough of that, letting them grab any lvl 4 they need is fair, ok buddy and jd is the most balance card ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted May 14, 2009 Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 Yes, letting them grab a lvl four warrior is fair. Absolutely. It's a +0, unlikely to give much advantage in the long run, it's not a game winner, all it does is make them a bit more versatile. Versatility=banworthy? No. JD is nothing like that, he confers huge advantages and often wins the game when summoned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roguewolf01 Posted May 14, 2009 Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 rose, i agree with you that RotA was fine at 2 negging it to 1 was stupid, but yes stratos is that good so he is at one. if he were at 2 or god forbid 3 then he would start a cycle of summon, searchx3 wich would make d heros more annyoing....... (lost train of thought) but yay even though statos is awesome he must stay at 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Majishan Posted May 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 Yes' date=' letting them grab a lvl four warrior is fair. Absolutely. It's a +0, unlikely to give much advantage in the long run, it's not a game winner, all it does is make them a bit more versatile. Versatility=banworthy? No. JD is nothing like that, he confers huge advantages and often wins the game when summoned.[/quote'] the jd comment was jus me being a smartass, but rota is better at 2, at three is to much. while it is a +0 the card you grab is more likely than not the card you need at the point in time. its like oh hey u have a really big monster on the field, let me get my friend exile force, oh you have really good traps back there, let me get my friend wild heart ect ect.rose' date=' i agree with you that RotA was fine at 2 negging it to 1 was stupid, but yes stratos is that good so he is at one. if he were at 2 or god forbid 3 then he would start a cycle of summon, searchx3 wich would make d heros more annyoing....... (lost train of thought) but yay even though statos is awesome he must stay at 1[/quote'] 3 stratos would be sexy, but broken. meh you made a valid point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted May 14, 2009 Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 Yes' date=' letting them grab a lvl four warrior is fair. Absolutely. It's a +0, unlikely to give much advantage in the long run, it's not a game winner, all it does is make them a bit more versatile. Versatility=banworthy? No. JD is nothing like that, he confers huge advantages and often wins the game when summoned.[/quote'] the jd comment was jus me being a smartass, Pity there wasn't actually anything "smart" about it. I would describe it as "dumb" instead. but rota is better at 2' date=' at three is to much. while it is a +0 the card you grab is more likely than not the card you need at the point in time. its like oh hey u have a really big monster on the field, let me get my friend exile force, oh you have really good traps back there, let me get my friend wild heart ect ect.[/quote'] Oh no, Exiled Force! We can allow them to tutor him twice per game, since that's perfectly fine, but three times is magically unacceptable somehow! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roguewolf01 Posted May 14, 2009 Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 yes smexy, but broken took the words right out of my mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Majishan Posted May 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 Yes' date=' letting them grab a lvl four warrior is fair. Absolutely. It's a +0, unlikely to give much advantage in the long run, it's not a game winner, all it does is make them a bit more versatile. Versatility=banworthy? No. JD is nothing like that, he confers huge advantages and often wins the game when summoned.[/quote'] the jd comment was jus me being a smartass, Pity there wasn't actually anything "smart" about it. I would describe it as "dumb" instead. but rota is better at 2' date=' at three is to much. while it is a +0 the card you grab is more likely than not the card you need at the point in time. its like oh hey u have a really big monster on the field, let me get my friend exile force, oh you have really good traps back there, let me get my friend wild heart ect ect.[/quote'] Oh no, Exiled Force! We can allow them to tutor him twice per game, since that's perfectly fine, but three times is magically unacceptable somehow! and having it at once makes more sense how? They killed the six samuria deck and most warror decks by putting it at one, so how is at one better? and oh yeah none of your smart ass comments give actual reasons for your point of view Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted May 14, 2009 Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 Yes' date=' letting them grab a lvl four warrior is fair. Absolutely. It's a +0, unlikely to give much advantage in the long run, it's not a game winner, all it does is make them a bit more versatile. Versatility=banworthy? No. JD is nothing like that, he confers huge advantages and often wins the game when summoned.[/quote'] the jd comment was jus me being a smartass, Pity there wasn't actually anything "smart" about it. I would describe it as "dumb" instead. but rota is better at 2' date=' at three is to much. while it is a +0 the card you grab is more likely than not the card you need at the point in time. its like oh hey u have a really big monster on the field, let me get my friend exile force, oh you have really good traps back there, let me get my friend wild heart ect ect.[/quote'] Oh no, Exiled Force! We can allow them to tutor him twice per game, since that's perfectly fine, but three times is magically unacceptable somehow! and having it at once makes more sense how? They killed the six samuria deck and most warror decks by putting it at one, so how is at one better? and oh yeah none of your smart ass comments give actual reasons for your point of view *turns toward audience* For those of you playing along at home, yes, you are correct, my post did make it perfectly clear that I believe ROTA should be at 3; MOTBR's assertions that I want it at 1 simply result from his stupidity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Majishan Posted May 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 Yes' date=' letting them grab a lvl four warrior is fair. Absolutely. It's a +0, unlikely to give much advantage in the long run, it's not a game winner, all it does is make them a bit more versatile. Versatility=banworthy? No. JD is nothing like that, he confers huge advantages and often wins the game when summoned.[/quote'] the jd comment was jus me being a smartass, Pity there wasn't actually anything "smart" about it. I would describe it as "dumb" instead. but rota is better at 2' date=' at three is to much. while it is a +0 the card you grab is more likely than not the card you need at the point in time. its like oh hey u have a really big monster on the field, let me get my friend exile force, oh you have really good traps back there, let me get my friend wild heart ect ect.[/quote'] Oh no, Exiled Force! We can allow them to tutor him twice per game, since that's perfectly fine, but three times is magically unacceptable somehow! and having it at once makes more sense how? They killed the six samuria deck and most warror decks by putting it at one, so how is at one better? and oh yeah none of your smart ass comments give actual reasons for your point of view *turns toward audience* For those of you playing along at home, yes, you are correct, my post did make it perfectly clear that I believe ROTA should be at 3; MOTBR's assertions that I want it at 1 simply result from his stupidity. hmm, sorry if i misunderstood you, didnt know that was against the rules oh great 1 who likes to insult ppl online because it makes him feel better for some strange reason.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted May 14, 2009 Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 Yes' date=' letting them grab a lvl four warrior is fair. Absolutely. It's a +0, unlikely to give much advantage in the long run, it's not a game winner, all it does is make them a bit more versatile. Versatility=banworthy? No. JD is nothing like that, he confers huge advantages and often wins the game when summoned.[/quote'] the jd comment was jus me being a smartass, Pity there wasn't actually anything "smart" about it. I would describe it as "dumb" instead. but rota is better at 2' date=' at three is to much. while it is a +0 the card you grab is more likely than not the card you need at the point in time. its like oh hey u have a really big monster on the field, let me get my friend exile force, oh you have really good traps back there, let me get my friend wild heart ect ect.[/quote'] Oh no, Exiled Force! We can allow them to tutor him twice per game, since that's perfectly fine, but three times is magically unacceptable somehow! and having it at once makes more sense how? They killed the six samuria deck and most warror decks by putting it at one, so how is at one better? and oh yeah none of your smart ass comments give actual reasons for your point of view *turns toward audience* For those of you playing along at home, yes, you are correct, my post did make it perfectly clear that I believe ROTA should be at 3; MOTBR's assertions that I want it at 1 simply result from his stupidity. hmm, sorry if i misunderstood you, didnt know that was against the rules It's not against the rules. It just makes you look like an idiot. oh great 1 who liked to insult ppl online because it makes him feel better for some strange reason.... lolnonsequiturs Also, it's the best way to troll, wot wot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Majishan Posted May 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 Yes' date=' letting them grab a lvl four warrior is fair. Absolutely. It's a +0, unlikely to give much advantage in the long run, it's not a game winner, all it does is make them a bit more versatile. Versatility=banworthy? No. JD is nothing like that, he confers huge advantages and often wins the game when summoned.[/quote'] the jd comment was jus me being a smartass, Pity there wasn't actually anything "smart" about it. I would describe it as "dumb" instead. but rota is better at 2' date=' at three is to much. while it is a +0 the card you grab is more likely than not the card you need at the point in time. its like oh hey u have a really big monster on the field, let me get my friend exile force, oh you have really good traps back there, let me get my friend wild heart ect ect.[/quote'] Oh no, Exiled Force! We can allow them to tutor him twice per game, since that's perfectly fine, but three times is magically unacceptable somehow! and having it at once makes more sense how? They killed the six samuria deck and most warror decks by putting it at one, so how is at one better? and oh yeah none of your smart ass comments give actual reasons for your point of view *turns toward audience* For those of you playing along at home, yes, you are correct, my post did make it perfectly clear that I believe ROTA should be at 3; MOTBR's assertions that I want it at 1 simply result from his stupidity. hmm, sorry if i misunderstood you, didnt know that was against the rules It's not against the rules. It just makes you look like an idiot. sure it does, because no one ever misunderstands anything...at all oh great 1 who liked to insult ppl online because it makes him feel better for some strange reason.... lolnonsequiturs Also' date=' it's the best way to troll, wot wot.[/quote'] also you have fun with that. you made me lol. congrats Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted May 14, 2009 Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 lol YCM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azure Posted May 14, 2009 Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 Well two is better but at this corrent format maybe he should stay at one... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Hyperion Posted May 14, 2009 Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 Putting Stratos semi-limited or unlimited turns him into a super-Gadget with beatstick powers and easy Spell/Trap destruction. Is it really that hard people? Oh, and before anybody says Ultimate Offering, that card is banworty kthx. Also, I remember discussions over the internetz that people found Stratos even banworty due the Tele-Dad period. Good times, good times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted May 14, 2009 Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 Stratos is finewhere he is. If it were at a number greater than 1 it would be a super gadget. And RotA belongs at 3. There is nothing wrong with Type and Level Specific tutoring like RotA. lol YCM This about sums up this topic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted May 14, 2009 Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 lol YCM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tefached Posted May 14, 2009 Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 i think every card should be able to be run at 3...hell lets just get rid of the ban list. that way i can run as many of any card that i want. /sarcasm] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.