Guest Star Posted May 10, 2009 Report Share Posted May 10, 2009 This idea came to me a while ago. Let's see how it looks on paper. Monsters [20] Vanity's Fiend [3] Snowman Eater [3]Thunder King Rai-Oh [3]Doomcaliber Knight [3]Koa'ki Meiru Guardian [3]Legendary Jujitsu Master [2]Snipe Hunter [1]Sangan [1]Breaker the Magical Warrior [1] Spells [10] Shrink [3]Allure of Darkness [2]Pot of Avarice [2]Monster Reborn [1]Brain Control [1]Giant Trunade [1] Traps [10] Royal Oppression [3]Solemn Judgment [3]Phoenix Wing Wind Blast [2]Mirror Force [1]Torrential Tribute [1] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Majishan Posted May 10, 2009 Report Share Posted May 10, 2009 seems solid on paper, try testing it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tronta Posted May 10, 2009 Report Share Posted May 10, 2009 shrink over burden because? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smeg Posted May 10, 2009 Report Share Posted May 10, 2009 shrink over burden because? Shrinks a surprise, and in this deck it wins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tronta Posted May 10, 2009 Report Share Posted May 10, 2009 k.id still throw in a pair of burdens for fun.find room. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bunter Dwayne Posted May 10, 2009 Report Share Posted May 10, 2009 Seems about as anti-metaish as you can get. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted May 10, 2009 Report Share Posted May 10, 2009 k.id still throw in a pair of burdens for fun.find room. What do I take out' date=' then? Seems about as anti-metaish as you can get. Basically what I was going for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.