Guest Chaos Pudding Posted May 8, 2009 Report Share Posted May 8, 2009 Seriously, one of the best films I have ever seen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyber Altair Posted May 8, 2009 Report Share Posted May 8, 2009 seriously? I expected major awards in the departments of ball sucking and ass licking =\ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted May 8, 2009 Report Share Posted May 8, 2009 No. Expect it to be nominated for the Raspberry Awards. It won't win, since Dragonball Evolution is going to win. I'll still watch it though, since I'm not a Trekkie. ....This is where problematica is supposed to come in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JoshIcy Posted May 8, 2009 Report Share Posted May 8, 2009 Looks epic.And being a part-time trekkie myself, I wanna see this >.<"... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parting Shot Posted May 8, 2009 Report Share Posted May 8, 2009 Ugh, no. This Star Trek film I anticipate to suck completely. If anything, it will be like the new James Bond movies: decent as a movie but just utter crap for the genre it's supposed to be part of >_> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted May 8, 2009 Report Share Posted May 8, 2009 http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/star_trek_11/ Over 200 reviews counted, and still at 96%. Does that look like suck to you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted May 8, 2009 Report Share Posted May 8, 2009 Damn, I was just going to post that. Okay, that was enough to convince me. Seriously, it managed to beat the Dark Knight by 2%, and 2 is a big number. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larxene Posted May 8, 2009 Report Share Posted May 8, 2009 Meh. I'll wait for the DVD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted May 9, 2009 Report Share Posted May 9, 2009 You always do that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JoshIcy Posted May 9, 2009 Report Share Posted May 9, 2009 Damn' date=' I was just going to post that. Okay, that was enough to convince me. Seriously, it managed to beat the Dark Knight by 2%, and 2 is a big number. I know it is O.O...And yeah, gonna ask to see this >.< that convinced me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeroshot Posted May 9, 2009 Report Share Posted May 9, 2009 I dunno. I liked the old Star Trek and modern remakes aren't as good. I'm still gonna see it though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted May 9, 2009 Report Share Posted May 9, 2009 It can be proven that 2 is a big number. Thought-experiment time! Suppose I tell you that each of two boxes, A and B, contains a certain amount of money; that one contains twice as much money as the other (but which is which is unknown); and that, after you choose one, you will receive however much money is in that box. Arbitrarily, you choose A. I open box A, and show you how much money is inside. It doesn't matter how much money it is; let's call it X. I then offer you the choice of sticking with box A or switching and taking the money in box B instead. Now, you think of it in this manner: you have a one-half chance of gaining an extra X amount of money by switching, and a one-half chance of losing X/2 amount of money by switching. Since the two are equal in probability but the potential profit outweighs the potential loss, you naturally choose to switch to box B, so you do so. However! Here is what you have overlooked: had you chosen box B in the first place instead of Box A, you would have used exactly the same logic and chosen to switch back to box A. Thus, even though your actions appeared perfectly logical, they merely reduced the problem back to the coin-flip it was before I offered you the chance to switch - your initial selection completely determined your final selection, and you wouldn't make any more money by switching every time than you would by keeping your original choice every time. What went wrong? Answer that, and you will understand why 2 is a big number. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Shore Posted May 9, 2009 Report Share Posted May 9, 2009 I really want to see this. It looks epic, although it'll be weird to see old Star Trek without corny special effects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyber Altair Posted May 9, 2009 Report Share Posted May 9, 2009 It can be proven that 2 is a big number. Thought-experiment time! Suppose I tell you that each of two boxes' date=' A and B, contains a certain amount of money; that one contains twice as much money as the other (but which is which is unknown); and that, after you choose one, you will receive however much money is in that box. Arbitrarily, you choose A. I open box A, and show you how much money is inside. It doesn't matter how much money it is; let's call it X. I then offer you the choice of sticking with box A or switching and taking the money in box B instead. Now, you think of it in this manner: you have a one-half chance of gaining an extra X amount of money by switching, and a one-half chance of losing X/2 amount of money by switching. Since the two are equal in probability but the potential profit outweighs the potential loss, you naturally choose to switch to box B, so you do so. However! Here is what you have overlooked: had you chosen box B in the first place instead of Box A, you would have used exactly the same logic and chosen to switch back to box A. Thus, even though your actions appeared perfectly logical, they merely reduced the problem back to the coin-flip it was before I offered you the chance to switch - your initial selection completely determined your final selection, and you wouldn't make any more money by switching every time than you would by keeping your original choice every time. What went wrong? Answer that, and you will understand why 2 is a big number.[/quote'] fu*k you >.> Anyway damn it seems good =\ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dad Posted May 9, 2009 Report Share Posted May 9, 2009 I got bored with the old Star Trek, because it was all talk. I saw the trailer for this movie and I was like, "Wtf? Power Rangers again?" Then it said Star Trek and I'm like. . . "No friggin way. I have to see it." Regardless, yeah I hope to enjoy it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted May 9, 2009 Report Share Posted May 9, 2009 Just got back from seeing it, and this is all I have to say. GODLY EPIC MOVIE IS GODLY EPIC AND I HEREBY COMMAND ALL OF YOU TO SEE IT NOW. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amethyst Phoenix Posted May 10, 2009 Report Share Posted May 10, 2009 I saw this today (yesterday now) too. Such....zetta.....win! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Emo~ Posted May 10, 2009 Report Share Posted May 10, 2009 I might see it. But most likely not because I am not into this kinda stuff. But maybe if it is really good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dad Posted May 10, 2009 Report Share Posted May 10, 2009 Just got back from seeing it' date=' and this is all I have to say. GODLY EPIC MOVIE IS GODLY EPIC AND I HEREBY COMMAND ALL OF YOU TO SEE IT NOW. Caps makes you big man sire. *kicks you down Sparta hole and seals it up* I saw this today (yesterday now) too. Such....zetta.....win! WTF is zeta? It sounds like an old man's favorite seasoning. STUPID. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amethyst Phoenix Posted May 10, 2009 Report Share Posted May 10, 2009 I saw this today (yesterday now) too. Such....zetta.....win! WTF is zeta? It sounds like an old man's favorite seasoning. STUPID. Zetta is the best adjective ever. Look it up, and then play TWEWY to appreciate it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dad Posted May 10, 2009 Report Share Posted May 10, 2009 I saw this today (yesterday now) too. Such....zetta.....win! WTF is zeta? It sounds like an old man's favorite seasoning. STUPID. Zetta is the best adjective ever. Look it up' date=' and then play TWEWY to appreciate it.[/quote'] No ma'am. The question was rhetorical, so I don't understand why you answered it. Regardless, TWEWY also sounds stupid. "Mommy! I found a TWEWY!" "Okay sweetheart, eat it up." >_> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted May 10, 2009 Report Share Posted May 10, 2009 TWEWY is the acronym for "The World Ends With You", which is what Organization XIII's new RP is based on. On-Topic: It amazes me that this movie had only half the budget Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End had. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amethyst Phoenix Posted May 10, 2009 Report Share Posted May 10, 2009 TWEWY is the acronym for "The World Ends With You"' date=' which is what Organization XIII's new RP is based on. On-Topic: It amazes me that this movie had only [b']half the budget Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End had.[/b] What th-......how in the he-............*voice of the scientist guy from DMC 4* IMPOSSIBLE!!! The fact that it can be this epic with half of that budget warps time and space O.O Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dad Posted May 10, 2009 Report Share Posted May 10, 2009 TWEWY is the acronym for "The World Ends With You"' date=' which is what Organization XIII's new RP is based on. On-Topic: It amazes me that this movie had only [i']half[/i] the budget Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End had. I ain't ignorant, so don't implyit. I know what TWEWY means. The abbreviation simply sounds stupid. TWEWY <<<<< Chewy Oh, and At World's End was a mediocre movie. It could've been so much better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommers2008 Posted May 10, 2009 Report Share Posted May 10, 2009 It can be proven that 2 is a big number. Thought-experiment time! Suppose I tell you that each of two boxes' date=' A and B, contains a certain amount of money; that one contains twice as much money as the other (but which is which is unknown); and that, after you choose one, you will receive however much money is in that box. Arbitrarily, you choose A. I open box A, and show you how much money is inside. It doesn't matter how much money it is; let's call it X. I then offer you the choice of sticking with box A or switching and taking the money in box B instead. Now, you think of it in this manner: you have a one-half chance of gaining an extra X amount of money by switching, and a one-half chance of losing X/2 amount of money by switching. Since the two are equal in probability but the potential profit outweighs the potential loss, you naturally choose to switch to box B, so you do so. However! Here is what you have overlooked: had you chosen box B in the first place instead of Box A, you would have used exactly the same logic and chosen to switch back to box A. Thus, even though your actions appeared perfectly logical, they merely reduced the problem back to the coin-flip it was before I offered you the chance to switch - your initial selection completely determined your final selection, and you wouldn't make any more money by switching every time than you would by keeping your original choice every time. What went wrong? Answer that, and you will understand why 2 is a big number.[/quote'] You really need to get out more, or at least find something else to occupy your mind.. Anyway im not a fan at all of star trek i am not really interested in seeing this, you say it got rating higher then dark knight by who critics most of them wouldn't no a good movie if it hit them in the face, i really see no way this could be better then the dark knight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.