Spy Meet Diva, Diva... meet spy

[iAmNateXero]

Cards needed:

 

Gravekeeper's Spy

Deep Sea Diva.

 

Synchro up two 6 stars synchro,or one 8 star and trib material. Either way, its control engine and all you really need is a set spy. This also works well with Rescue cat and XSA. But you already knew that.

 

Not so much as a strategy as an idea.

[Guest PikaPerson01]

So you're cunning strategy is "Gravekeeper Spy can be used as Synchro Material".

 

*Facepalm*

[Crow™]

Because these cards go SO well together........You would OBVIOUSLY use both or none.....

[Felix]

WTF? Am I missing something here:?

[moneypony]

You got some parts wrong,your only combinations are:

2 Diva +2 Spy

2 LV 6 Synchro

1 LV 6 Synchro + 1 Diva + 1 Spy

1 LV 9 Synchro + Diva

 

This combination can't make a level 8 synchro,but this combo is like a slower E-Tele + Malicious - 2 levels

[CrabHelmet]

What Pika said; I'm not seeing anything special here.

 

You got some parts wrong' date='your only combinations are:

2 Diva +2 Spy

2 LV 6 Synchro

1 LV 6 Synchro + 1 Diva + 1 Spy

1 LV 9 Synchro + Diva

 

This combination can't make a level 8 synchro,but this combo is like a slower E-Tele + Malicious - 2 levels

[/quote']

 

Tune the Level 6 Synchro to the second Diva, you moron.

[iAmNateXero]

So you're cunning strategy is "Gravekeeper Spy can be used as Synchro Material".

 

*Facepalm*

 

Not so much as a strategy as an idea.

 

Its as much as a strategy as Super ancient deep sea king colencath.

 

However the strategy doesn't come from just these two cards, but of the +'s it makes as fast as it makes them. Imagine this. On turn one, you set a spy. It gets attacked, but not destroyed. Thats +1. You draw, You summon Diva and activate effect, Thats still 5 cards in your hand with 2 big creatures and 0 effort. Now lets also add to the deck idea of things like Rescue cat and arbilum, Thats clearly an otk 3200 + 2400 = 5600 Than synch into 2 DSF, but in the end your right. It all comes down to Spy = Good synchro material.

 

Lets also add, that this may be the ONLY deck where PoA would come in handy. Everything in the deck searches and thins, so it turns into nothing but +1's, and can be activated as soon as turn 2.

[Guest PikaPerson01]

Blah blah blah

 

Have you been sleeping since '08 or something? People have been discussing quick and easy ways to get high levels out on the field since Synchros and Tuners were first announced.

 

Gravekeeper's Spy has always been mentioned in such discussions, and it doesn't take a rocket science to piece together that a monster that SS-es a monster from the deck could be used for a Synchro Summon.

 

This isn't really as clever or game breaking as you'd like to thing.

[iAmNateXero]

Blah blah blah

I don't believe people will think Im cool if I don't state the obvious in an annoying manner' date=' even after a person admitted to stating more of an obvious.

[/quote']

So what was the point of your message again? o.O

 

Also I think we can lock now.

[LiAM]

I think there's a better combo with these.

 

But I spose its an OK idea... =/

[Guest PikaPerson01]

Blah blah blah

I don't believe people will think Im cool if I don't state the obvious in an annoying manner' date=' even after a person admitted to stating more of an obvious.

[/quote']

So what was the point of your message again? o.O

 

Also I think we can lock now.

 

Tha pretty much was my point. There was no need in making this topic because it was a stupid waste of time for anyone reading it. You knew this topic was just worthless spam yet went about posting it anyway and as such you should be barred from posting ever again for such ineptitude. Thanks for agreeing.

[iAmNateXero]

Blah blah blah

I don't believe people will think Im cool if I don't state the obvious in an annoying manner' date=' even after a person admitted to stating more of an obvious.

[/quote']

So what was the point of your message again? o.O

 

Also I think we can lock now.

 

Tha pretty much was my point. There was no need in making this topic because it was a stupid waste of time for anyone reading it. You knew this topic was just worthless spam yet went about posting it anyway and as such you should be barred from posting ever again for such ineptitude. Thanks for agreeing.

 

You obviously don't think that, and if so why are you wasting your oh so precious time complaining about it? You should really prioritize your time better. What you can do is not reply, let the forum die, and stop thinking that you need the last word in everything. It helps build character, and if all else fails, you can tell yourself you're the bigger man so you can sleep soundly at night.

 

At the time I thought about it, I was thinking about a deck idea of making a completely searchable deck, so no... I didn't think it was spam. I also don't believe the "Strategy" section on the forum should be dedicated to only OTK's. Where's the thinking part come in when the answer is already spelled out to you? An otk is nice, but what we really should be discussing about it is how do we guarantee it? What decks its weak against and how to make it stronger? And not so much "lolitzafivzcordzcomba."

[Baroque in Paradise]

*sigh* Nate12345, Pikaperson01, I think what we have here is what's called . . .

 

A flame war.

 

My advice? Knock it off, the both of you, you've each said your piece so now stop trying to tear each other to pieces, you're just making the two of you look bad -- or rather, extremely immature.

 

All that's been established (or, as Pikaperson01 has said, reaffirmed) through all this is that 1) Spy makes for good Synchro fodder, 2) Diva makes for good Synchro fodder, 3) the two of them together make good Synchro fodder, and 4) neither of you knows when to quit while you're ahead, and frankly I think we all (yourselves included) could do a little less of you proving me right on number 4.

 

So, either talk about the potential behind the two cards or move the vitriol to whatever this board has for a Chatterbox and let this thread be, as has been previously suggested, locked.

 

OK?

[Guest PikaPerson01]

Blah blah blah

I don't believe people will think Im cool if I don't state the obvious in an annoying manner' date=' even after a person admitted to stating more of an obvious.

[/quote']

So what was the point of your message again? o.O

 

Also I think we can lock now.

 

Tha pretty much was my point. There was no need in making this topic because it was a stupid waste of time for anyone reading it. You knew this topic was just worthless spam yet went about posting it anyway and as such you should be barred from posting ever again for such ineptitude. Thanks for agreeing.

 

You obviously don't think that, and if so why are you wasting your oh so precious time complaining about it? You should really prioritize your time better. What you can do is not reply, let the forum die, and stop thinking that you need the last word in everything. It helps build character, and if all else fails, you can tell yourself you're the bigger man so you can sleep soundly at night.

 

At the time I thought about it, I was thinking about a deck idea of making a completely searchable deck, so no... I didn't think it was spam. I also don't believe the "Strategy" section on the forum should be dedicated to only OTK's. Where's the thinking part come in when the answer is already spelled out to you? An otk is nice, but what we really should be discussing about it is how do we guarantee it? What decks its weak against and how to make it stronger? And not so much "lolitzafivzcordzcomba."

 

These posts don't take a long time to write you know. Minute, minute and a half tops if I can't think of what to write off the top of my head and need to think for a bit, or if I feel like writing at a length. Your whole "prioritize your time" spiel just sounds like the desperate please of a man trying to wriggle his way out of an argument to me.

 

Point is, this topic was useless from the beginning but I still find it funny you continue to flop around like this.

 

As far as "lolitzafivzcordzcomba" goes, there's no point in discussing a combo that uses a high amount of pieces, because there are just so many five card OTKs that exist, any number higher is horribly inconsistent.

 

The problem I see isn't so much that it's not an OTK, but rather that it's not original or insightful in the least.

 

*sigh* Nate12345' date=' Pikaperson01, I think what we have here is what's called . . .

 

[i']A flame war.[/i]

 

My advice? Knock it off, the both of you, you've each said your piece so now stop trying to tear each other to pieces, you're just making the two of you look bad -- or rather, extremely immature.

 

All that's been established (or, as Pikaperson01 has said, reaffirmed) through all this is that 1) Spy makes for good Synchro fodder, 2) Diva makes for good Synchro fodder, 3) the two of them together make good Synchro fodder, and 4) neither of you knows when to quit while you're ahead, and frankly I think we all (yourselves included) could do a little less of you proving me right on number 4.

 

So, either talk about the potential behind the two cards or move the vitriol to whatever this board has for a Chatterbox and let this thread be, as has been previously suggested, locked.

 

OK?

 

Lol, the kid's mini-modding.