burnpsy Posted April 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 BUMP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crow™ Posted April 28, 2009 Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 I'm guesing that's the Golem that Kirby is talking about because that card is good against Lightsworns too. Unless he means Lava or Grinder Golem? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted April 29, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 29, 2009 One for One in this deck. Thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crow™ Posted April 30, 2009 Report Share Posted April 30, 2009 Maybe. To get Cyber Valley out right? That could work... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted April 30, 2009 Report Share Posted April 30, 2009 One for One in this deck. Thoughts? Bad idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted April 30, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 30, 2009 Very well then... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SephirothKirby Posted April 30, 2009 Report Share Posted April 30, 2009 Slingen is ridiculously broken in Morphtronics. Run 1 or 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted May 1, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 1, 2009 axed Trunade for Slingen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SephirothKirby Posted May 1, 2009 Report Share Posted May 1, 2009 You're easy to persuade. At first I thought Slingen was terrible, but after testing, god damn he wins games. Celfon -> Dupe -> Clogged Field. But Celfon -> Dupe -> Pull a Sligen (which is inevitable) -> Nuke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted May 1, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 1, 2009 I saw a player use Slingen on DMU about a week ago. I saw it for how good it was at that point, though my deck still beat his by a mile. I was also looking for a reason to axe trunade... >.> It's been roughly... Useless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avariademon Posted June 9, 2009 Report Share Posted June 9, 2009 Terrible logic. If you have one monster on the field' date=' the GB player WILL attack it, otherwise their engine won't even work.[/quote'] It's not terrible logic, all that it does is give you like .0001 of an advantage against Glads, it shouldn't hurt experienced players at all. Depending on the opponents skill level, any with 5/10 skill should be able to counter this. That's like saying SIM didn't hurt teledad because teledad could still take the victory a lot. It seriously hinders glads by preventing them from tagging out, fusing, or using test tiger. Or respite. Or a ton to other gb cards. I challenge you to come up with an anti GB card that works better that could be integrated into this deck. Only RO is superior, and maybe Skill Drain. Neither work in this deck. You side RO generally anyway even in TeleDaDs sometimes. Get him and stardust out and stop your opponent from SS which stops common solutions to TeleDaD. I'm not saying G.B. Hunter is bad, I mean against a high amount of Glad users it would help, but it's of no use at any higher-then-locals tournaments. Please tell me how "it's of no use." If I set a monster, the GB player will attack it. Then, if it was too powerful, he's liable to bring out murmillo or something like Hoplomus/Laquari with high stats to wait out the next turn. If GB hunter is the monster, their strategies are frozen in place and they will be easy to pick off. honestly running G.B. hunter to anti Gbeast is just as bad as running mask of restrict to anti monarchs, yeah it stops the strategy till they get a way around it, and believe me G.B. hunter is easier to find a way around. monsters are always easier to kill. granted it puts a wrench in the works, but do you know what was a better card against monarchs? pulling the rug. people sided what 2-3 of them just to stop monarchs. you know why people used pulling over mask? because pulling actually gets rid of the card. mask of restrict is basically a stall card, it dose not make them lose advantage, it merely stalls them till they have a way around it. now the card that would be like the pulling of anti gb is mirror of oath, and i would suggest to at least give it a shot. but to be honest? royal oppresion is still the best way to stop Gbeast. granted, it allows your opponent to stop your special summons to, but have you ever seen a Gbeast deck go against royal oppresion? its like watching a stall burn or something, they pretty much stop doing anything because the one thing Gbeast cant do without is their special summons. i honestly dont think any other deck specials as much as they do but i could be wrong. royal oppresion for the side. yes it can hurt your deck but thats why you use it like a solemn only when there is no other choice. One for One in this deck. Thoughts? Bad idea. WRONG, one for one is an awesome card, i would never run a morphtronic without it. come on it gets one of your key cards or one of your key draw cards how is that not good? still think its bad? how bout the fact that its a +0 with a celfon how about the fact that (provided you discard a morphtronic) you now have targets for junk box. the reasons to use it are just to many to list. id suggest running 2 though i run 3 id probably suggest 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted June 9, 2009 Report Share Posted June 9, 2009 Terrible logic. If you have one monster on the field' date=' the GB player WILL attack it, otherwise their engine won't even work.[/quote'] It's not terrible logic, all that it does is give you like .0001 of an advantage against Glads, it shouldn't hurt experienced players at all. Depending on the opponents skill level, any with 5/10 skill should be able to counter this. That's like saying SIM didn't hurt teledad because teledad could still take the victory a lot. It seriously hinders glads by preventing them from tagging out, fusing, or using test tiger. Or respite. Or a ton to other gb cards. I challenge you to come up with an anti GB card that works better that could be integrated into this deck. Only RO is superior, and maybe Skill Drain. Neither work in this deck. You side RO generally anyway even in TeleDaDs sometimes. Get him and stardust out and stop your opponent from SS which stops common solutions to TeleDaD. I'm not saying G.B. Hunter is bad, I mean against a high amount of Glad users it would help, but it's of no use at any higher-then-locals tournaments. Please tell me how "it's of no use." If I set a monster, the GB player will attack it. Then, if it was too powerful, he's liable to bring out murmillo or something like Hoplomus/Laquari with high stats to wait out the next turn. If GB hunter is the monster, their strategies are frozen in place and they will be easy to pick off. honestly running G.B. hunter to anti Gbeast is just as bad as running mask of restrict to anti monarchs, yeah it stops the strategy till they get a way around it, and believe me G.B. hunter is easier to find a way around. monsters are always easier to kill. granted it puts a wrench in the works, but do you know what was a better card against monarchs? pulling the rug. people sided what 2-3 of them just to stop monarchs. you know why people used pulling over mask? because pulling actually gets rid of the card. mask of restrict is basically a stall card, it dose not make them lose advantage, it merely stalls them till they have a way around it. now the card that would be like the pulling of anti gb is mirror of oath, and i would suggest to at least give it a shot. but to be honest? royal oppresion is still the best way to stop Gbeast. granted, it allows your opponent to stop your special summons to, but have you ever seen a Gbeast deck go against royal oppresion? its like watching a stall burn or something, they pretty much stop doing anything because the one thing Gbeast cant do without is their special summons. i honestly dont think any other deck specials as much as they do but i could be wrong. royal oppresion for the side. yes it can hurt your deck but thats why you use it like a solemn only when there is no other choice. One for One in this deck. Thoughts? Bad idea. WRONG' date=' one for one is an awesome card, i would never run a morphtronic without it. come on it gets one of your key cards or one of your key draw cards how is that not good? still think its bad? how bout the fact that its a +0 with a celfon how about the fact that (provided you discard a morphtronic) you now have targets for junk box. the reasons to use it are just to many to list. id suggest running 2 though i run 3 id probably suggest 2[/quote'] LOLNECROBUMP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avariademon Posted June 10, 2009 Report Share Posted June 10, 2009 Terrible logic. If you have one monster on the field' date=' the GB player WILL attack it, otherwise their engine won't even work.[/quote'] It's not terrible logic, all that it does is give you like .0001 of an advantage against Glads, it shouldn't hurt experienced players at all. Depending on the opponents skill level, any with 5/10 skill should be able to counter this. That's like saying SIM didn't hurt teledad because teledad could still take the victory a lot. It seriously hinders glads by preventing them from tagging out, fusing, or using test tiger. Or respite. Or a ton to other gb cards. I challenge you to come up with an anti GB card that works better that could be integrated into this deck. Only RO is superior, and maybe Skill Drain. Neither work in this deck. You side RO generally anyway even in TeleDaDs sometimes. Get him and stardust out and stop your opponent from SS which stops common solutions to TeleDaD. I'm not saying G.B. Hunter is bad, I mean against a high amount of Glad users it would help, but it's of no use at any higher-then-locals tournaments. Please tell me how "it's of no use." If I set a monster, the GB player will attack it. Then, if it was too powerful, he's liable to bring out murmillo or something like Hoplomus/Laquari with high stats to wait out the next turn. If GB hunter is the monster, their strategies are frozen in place and they will be easy to pick off. honestly running G.B. hunter to anti Gbeast is just as bad as running mask of restrict to anti monarchs, yeah it stops the strategy till they get a way around it, and believe me G.B. hunter is easier to find a way around. monsters are always easier to kill. granted it puts a wrench in the works, but do you know what was a better card against monarchs? pulling the rug. people sided what 2-3 of them just to stop monarchs. you know why people used pulling over mask? because pulling actually gets rid of the card. mask of restrict is basically a stall card, it dose not make them lose advantage, it merely stalls them till they have a way around it. now the card that would be like the pulling of anti gb is mirror of oath, and i would suggest to at least give it a shot. but to be honest? royal oppresion is still the best way to stop Gbeast. granted, it allows your opponent to stop your special summons to, but have you ever seen a Gbeast deck go against royal oppresion? its like watching a stall burn or something, they pretty much stop doing anything because the one thing Gbeast cant do without is their special summons. i honestly dont think any other deck specials as much as they do but i could be wrong. royal oppresion for the side. yes it can hurt your deck but thats why you use it like a solemn only when there is no other choice. One for One in this deck. Thoughts? Bad idea. WRONG' date=' one for one is an awesome card, i would never run a morphtronic without it. come on it gets one of your key cards or one of your key draw cards how is that not good? still think its bad? how bout the fact that its a +0 with a celfon how about the fact that (provided you discard a morphtronic) you now have targets for junk box. the reasons to use it are just to many to list. id suggest running 2 though i run 3 id probably suggest 2[/quote'] LOLNECROBUMP LOL WHOA i had no idea this thread was that old heh, sorry its just the guy posted a link to this thread on my morphtronics i didnt know it was dead XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.