bury the year Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 The exchange must be zero or better. Losing an arm to save someone is always worthwhile. Killing someone to save someone else is neutral. Killing someone and losing an arm is a net loss' date=' so it would not be worthwhile.[/quote'] Very... economically-minded, Crab. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azmodius Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 To be completely honest' date=' save myself first, then help anyone else I could.[/quote'] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 To what lengths would you go to:1)Keep yourself alive...I would keep myself alive at any cost as long as there isn't any other people in danger for what I'm doing. In the case where there are' date=' it depends on the person I'm sacrificing (not if its close to me or just an aquantance, I'm talking on their background, If I think I deserve more to be saved).[/b']2)Keep a stranger alive... refer to #13)Keep a celebrity alive...in most situations, I don't care. If the selebrity is an unusual kind that that doesn't want to be one, and is a great person (the type that pretty much doesn't exist), I would do as much as for #24)Keep a friend/relative alive...more likely to happen than the previews options5)Keep a person you hate alive...refer to #1 (I'm pretty sure you noticed all my answers revolve around #1 for some reason =/ ) This is not a world full of people that could care less for other human lives. As with everything else, two opposites exist.-First theory: most people will say they are willing to sacrifice themselves for others when deep inside, they would cowardly run away and let their closest people get killed in extreme situations.-Opposite theory: some people (even the most shy and quiet little person can give this surprise) can think of themselves and the rest of the world as the kind that would save themselves first without caring for others, and when a real extreme condition happens, they are the first ones taking the lead, sacrifcing themselves to save others. Some people have already passed through something like this before and know what they are capable of. -I to some digree, would try to save others first rather than live with such a weight on myself. No regrets is my thing ;) (some people say I'm too innosent and quiet, so.. I could be just living in a fantasy :( , but still, that's my belief) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shrekstasy Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 1) Everything.2) See #5.3) Depends on whom I am saving.4) Pretty far...I wouldn't die, of course.5) I'd kill that person and string his/her entrails in a tree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dad Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 A few simple words sums it up for me: Any and everything illegal. >=3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.