Prada Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 Must give CnC to vote. Based on Depth, flow, and compo, and text if added. First to ten wins. =] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Madsen Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 So I can haz see tagz? EDIT: OH.THE TAGZ. EDIT2::KHaris. Depth is bad on both IMO.In haris' tag style flow isn't too required tbhI liek the concept of haris' tag, so composition is nice IMO =DBit bright. Text- Nice and simple tbh. RaiN(I know^) Mehish depth.Why?It's way mono >_>I hate mono.Flow is nice.Composition is niec =D Haris GTV Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brushfire Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 sheet. Voted by accident. Too out of my ability to give CnC to these. :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Shore Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 the + on haris's steals the focal and annoys the hell out of me, however, it is more interesting and better composed. rain's is well blended and composed, and overall a great tag, however, its less interesting and doesn't seem to have the kind of scope that haris does. although its monotone, I also like the color. Its incredibly close, but I vote raIN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prada Posted April 12, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 Thanks for voting. Brush - Too out of your ability? Well, try and say who you voted for. xD Blesh - Haris' tag is monotone as well, but mkay. So, for now Haris - 1raiN - 1 I forgot to add the option to show who voted for what. Lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
problematica Posted April 13, 2009 Report Share Posted April 13, 2009 Top:There are a bunch of spots where it should be darkerSome of the blurred spots don't look great with sharp spots right next to them, the drop in sharpness is too suddenThe + sign is really out of place, it's a good idea you just didn't get it right Bottom:MonotoneEffect over the foot and hand are badDepth is meh at bestBlending is meh, It looks like he's there but it doesn't really feel like he isFlow is okay, not good but getting there Meh, don't really have a lot to say about either, must be getting tired or something.Top has my vote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prada Posted April 13, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 13, 2009 Crap. So close. D: Haris - 2raiN - 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harhar Posted April 13, 2009 Report Share Posted April 13, 2009 The + sign is really out of place' date=' it's a good idea you just didn't get it right [/quote'] Where would it better fit? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freeshooter Posted April 13, 2009 Report Share Posted April 13, 2009 I like haris' tag simply because I like B/W tags. Also, raiN, bit bigger next time ^~^ EDIT: Also, haris' tag has more flow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frlf Posted April 13, 2009 Report Share Posted April 13, 2009 Okay... Haris: Great depth, a bit monotone. The + sign could have better positioning. I know this must have been such a jabroniy tag to make. I don't like that the city stock looks more realistic than CA, and the bottom left of the tag. Compo is awesome =p Willie Wonka Deliverance: I don't like how it seems that the render takes almost the whole space. The effect at the middle'ish right its just ugly. Monotone, and it just seems not okay and the space limited. Dun really get it. Its not bad... its just less... attracting? The tag is really good and all, but it just doesn't catch my attention. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prada Posted April 13, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 13, 2009 Freeshooter - Based on depth and compo too. =P Frlf - Thanks for the CnC mate. =] Haris - 3 raiN - 1 D: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freeshooter Posted April 14, 2009 Report Share Posted April 14, 2009 Sorry, I'm still terrible at sig making. I somewhat understand flow, but I don't understand depth and composition at all... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
problematica Posted April 14, 2009 Report Share Posted April 14, 2009 The + sign is really out of place' date=' it's a good idea you just didn't get it right [/quote'] Where would it better fit? I would say to the right more, a little off of him. I'm not too acquainted with it though, but Cyber could give you a better idea since he's done it more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harhar Posted April 14, 2009 Report Share Posted April 14, 2009 The + sign is really out of place' date=' it's a good idea you just didn't get it right [/quote'] Where would it better fit? I would say to the right more, a little off of him. I'm not too acquainted with it though, but Cyber could give you a better idea since he's done it more. Alright thanks =] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
§hadow §triker Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 Haris- + sign is distracting and badly place. Got good depth. Flow is Ok. Some of the blurring seems overdone. Your compo is good. raiN- Depth=ok, Flow=meh, Composition=nice.Overall, haris wins Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JG. Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 I don't have enough time to CnC, but haris gets my vote. I'll CnC tomorrow. EDIT: I do have time actually. haris: I like stock tags with little effects alot, so that scores high. As prob said, the blur next to shrpen is kinda distracting, or what to call it, try to make it kinda fade instead. I must admit the stuff in the bottom left corner is kinda distrcting though. raiN: Floating foot for the lulz. Render is too covered. Depth is ok, as is flow. Lighting is mediocre. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.