Guest KAJN Posted April 11, 2009 Report Share Posted April 11, 2009 !i!i!i!i!i Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lemniscate Posted April 11, 2009 Report Share Posted April 11, 2009 Lighting feels off, like the way the light on top of the girl's head is coming from above left, and the lighting for the rest seems to come from behind. idk. :? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leon Lonewolf Posted April 11, 2009 Report Share Posted April 11, 2009 a nice sig. 7.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiAM Posted April 11, 2009 Report Share Posted April 11, 2009 i dont like it, a blurred photo with a badly rendered anime picture... too simple. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest KAJN Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 i dont like it' date=' a blurred photo with a badly rendered anime picture... too simple.[/quote'] Stock Not Blurred. Focal isn't poorly render. (Called Futura outlining). Not simple. Balloons Rendered & effects added. Taiga:: Explanation:: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiAM Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 whats with the black lines, and the futura thing, i dont notice it, looks like spare pixels, maybe try an aura or somthing. and stock, you mean a photo with smudge ontop and a few balloons, basically 3 image components. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest KAJN Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 whats with the black lines' date=' and the futura thing, i dont notice it, looks like spare pixels, maybe try an aura or somthing. and stock, you mean a photo with smudge ontop and a few balloons, basically 3 image components.[/quote']The black stroke shows where the lines are coming from in the explanation tag I just made. Red means the light is hitting the head which is not a mistake. You don't even know what Futura is because I created that concept -.- Yes I just did. It's making a cut magazine look like. There is no smudging. Balloons had 3 layers clipped on top of each of them. There might be like 30 + PPW's. When you make something better. Tell me >_>. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lemniscate Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 Trust me Marvel, this isn't simple, it just looks like it. Also, thanks for explanation Omni. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiAM Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 okay... i tried a 3 layer thing, excuse the smudging, it took 3 seconds to do. i honestly dont think you had 30 layers, its just 3 things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lemniscate Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 Hmmm, if it is only 3 things, and it is so easy, then why does his look good and yours doesn't.Stop saying it's simple, it's really not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legend Zero Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 Marvel just accept your fail and move on. Omni I don't like how there is around 0 depth but I do like the outcome. Since you said that you made the balloons from scratch you just got a whole lot of respect from me. B-E-A-UTIFUL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiAM Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 I still dont like it, the render looks like its not been cut properly and the background is just blurrs, sorry, this just doesnt impress me as much as your other work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harhar Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 Marvel just accept your fail and move on. Omni I don't like how there is around 0 depth but I do like the outcome. Since you said that you made the balloons from scratch you just got a whole lot of respect from me. B-E-A-UTIFUL Sorry mate but your wrong.There is depth =PI think it's a bit-oversharpened in places but other than that this is nice ;D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiAM Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 I just had an idea, can you convert this to a downloadable .xcf document I want to see the layers and such, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legend Zero Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 Marvel just accept your fail and move on. Omni I don't like how there is around 0 depth but I do like the outcome. Since you said that you made the balloons from scratch you just got a whole lot of respect from me. B-E-A-UTIFUL Sorry mate but your wrong.There is depth =PI think it's a bit-oversharpened in places but other than that this is nice ;D Since it was a stock I don't count that in my rating style. Try and get me next time. ;-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest KAJN Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 Marvel:: lololololololololololololol 31 layers. PWNT BABY![spoiler=OMNI PWNZ N00BS] Hehe, Thanks zero. Haris, gonna blur the background soon ;). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harhar Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 Marvel just accept your fail and move on. Omni I don't like how there is around 0 depth but I do like the outcome. Since you said that you made the balloons from scratch you just got a whole lot of respect from me. B-E-A-UTIFUL Sorry mate but your wrong.There is depth =PI think it's a bit-oversharpened in places but other than that this is nice ;D Since it was a stock I don't count that in my rating style. Try and get me next time. ;-) Lol I got you =PHe used the stock to his advantage and with it he achieved depth.It's not his fault that the stock had depth to begin with. Most people use stocks without depth and and add depth but in Omni's case he skipped a step.Besides in the end we count the overall tag not the stock or balloon in the tag. If the stock has depth then so does Omni's tag because the stock is in Omni's tag and you count what it looks like in the end. Just because he used a stock which already had depth doesn't mean that his tag doesn't have depth anymore because he used it =PI hope you understand what I mean.Tho since it is your standards you can rate what ever the hell you want ;D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huntar! Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 Its interesting, but still nice. I think the sharpness is fine and I like the anime girl even though I personally dont like it with the background. Good all around though. ;D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legend Zero Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 Well I'll keep my way of rating, but since you tried so hard to sway me I'll give you the point. Impressive speech I may be taking notes right now to use on you later. ;-) None the less impressive tag Omni. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harhar Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 Well I'll keep my way of rating' date=' but since you tried so hard to sway me I'll give you the point. [img']http://i41.tinypic.com/sw8yl5.png[/img]Impressive speech I may be taking notes right now to use on you later. ;-) None the less impressive tag Omni. D:You surely have something to counter my speech D:I only tried hard because you "telepathically" did the three finger taunt D:Tho I'm loving the point ;D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest KAJN Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 I actually added depth at the beginning but you're also right haris xD. ( get on MSN, Letz talk about yesterdayz :P ) Thanks huntew & thanks again Zero. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-DG- Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 teh outline on the render is a little pixely, but, still, I love it ^_^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest KAJN Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 teh outline on the render is a little pixely' date=' but, still, I love it ^_^[/quote'] I got that from a lot of people so I might have to clean it D: . Thanks for commenting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-DG- Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 no prob. Hey, sorry about all the arguing beforez. I getz a temper sometimes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
「tea.leaf」 Posted April 12, 2009 Report Share Posted April 12, 2009 Less chick, more city. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.