The Nameless Set

[Sunshine Jesse]

Came up with this theme a while ago, don't know if its been done before.

 

Nameless Warrior

Level 4

1500 ATK/ 1500 DEF

WIND

Warrior

The name of this card isn't treated as "Nameless Warrior" for the purposes of card effects. When this card battles, increase its ATK by 500 during the damage step.

 

Nameless Monk

Level 4

1000 ATK/ 700 DEF

DARK

Spellcaster/Tuner

The name of this card isn't treated as "Nameless Monk" for the purposes of card effects. You can send this card along with one nameless monster on your side of the field to Syncrho Summon one appropriate monster, ignoring the summoning conditions.

 

(Basically, this card can be used to syncrho summon one syncrho monster that requires a specific monster without said monster.)

 

Nameless Knight

Level 6

2600 ATK/1000 DEF

LIGHT

Warrior

The name of this card isn't treated as "Nameless Knight" for the purposes of card effects. You can Special Summon this card by tributing one nameless monster.

 

Nameless Dragon

Level 8

LIGHT

Dragon

3200 ATK/3000 DEF

The name of this card isn't treated as "Nameless Dragon" for the purposes of card effects. When this card would be removed from the field by a card effect, you can send one nameless monster from your hand or field to the graveyard to negate the effect the card would've had on this one.

 

Nameless Bounty

Spell card

The name of this card isn't treated as "Nameless Bounty" for the purposes of card effects. Discard one nameless card from your hand, or send one nameless card from either side of the field to the Graveyard. Draw 2 cards from your deck.

 

Identity Break

Trap card

Select one card on the field. The selected card's name isn't treated as its original name.

 

 

I said "for the purposes of card effects" on the cards because if not then you could have an unlimited amount of those cards in your deck (I think either an unlimited amount or only 3). The concept behind this card is so tricky that I didn't know how to word the OCG for some of the cards >_>

Opinions?

[Umbra]

I believe the right wording for these are "While this card is face-up on the field, it's name is not treated as ". Ripped directly from the Clear monsters, which work in a similar way, except with Attributes instead of card names. This should also fix it so that you can't have more than three in your Deck.

[goldenboy820]

Good but you may need another theme, since limiting to three cardz is a rule.

7/10 and nitton, I happened to like clear cards. A lot.

[Umbra]

Good but you may need another theme' date=' since limiting to three cardz is a rule.

 

[b']I don't see how that rule is a problem for this archetype. With either wording, that rule is still applied.[/b]

 

7/10 and nitton, I happened to like clear cards. A lot.

 

So do I.