Silas Angel Posted April 8, 2009 Report Share Posted April 8, 2009 The question doesn't ask whether or not it is right, but it asks if it should be allowed. My statement has been made. No need to say any more =/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zexaeon Posted April 8, 2009 Report Share Posted April 8, 2009 Mr. Brent-banshee-whateverthefuck: You are either a deeply disturbed heterosexual, or a self-hating homosexual. Because guess what? Homosexuality is not a choice. If it were, then I wouldn't be one. Let's be logical here, for just a monet - do you really think that if it WAS a choice, I would have chosen to grow up with a lifestyle that would result in my being ridiculed? No, had I choice in the matter, I would have chosen what was "Normal". If you are REALLY gay, then you simply hate yourself for it based on what I'm reading. And if you're not gay, but choose men anyway...well, I don't know what to say to that. =/ I ain't touching that. In any case, I DON'T hate myself. I'm happy with how I turned out. And for you to say that gay marriage is wrong, despite the fact that there is tons of real, scientific evidence to prove that people are born that way, makes you nothing but a close-minded idiot.Another interesting note - the government has long since stood by the fact that matters of Religeon and Government are to be kept seperate. Marriage has become a very LEGAL procedure. How can people suddenly claim that it violates the sanctity of marriage, when marriage, being a legal thing, should no longer be a religeous issue? Also, for the record, I in fact am religeous. But that does not mean I mindlessly believe everything that the bible says. The bible may have been written by God, but that doesn't mean it was ADAPTED over the countless ages by God. Man has transliterated, again and again, what the bible says for centuries. It's perfectly reasonable that things would be lost, skewed, or even deliberately changed, in translation. That's why I don't do Organized Religeon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Emo~ Posted April 8, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 8, 2009 Mr. Brent-banshee-whateverthefuck: You are either a deeply disturbed heterosexual' date=' or a self-hating homosexual. Because guess what? Homosexuality is not a choice. If it were, then I wouldn't be one. Let's be logical here, for just a monet - do you really think that if it WAS a choice, I would have chosen to grow up with a lifestyle that would result in my being ridiculed? No, had I choice in the matter, I would have chosen what was "Normal". If you are REALLY gay, then you simply hate yourself for it based on what I'm reading. And if you're not gay, but choose men anyway...well, I don't know what to say to that. =/ I ain't touching that. In any case, I DON'T hate myself. I'm happy with how I turned out. And for you to say that gay marriage is wrong, despite the fact that there is tons of real, scientific evidence to prove that people are born that way, makes you nothing but a close-minded idiot.[/quote'] He is gay, believe me. I saw his pics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ProjectClow Posted April 8, 2009 Report Share Posted April 8, 2009 i dont think i have ever heard a legitamentlly sound point (non religious) against gay marriage. why hasnt it been made legal yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Emo~ Posted April 8, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 8, 2009 Because I am only 15 and don't run New York. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davok Posted April 8, 2009 Report Share Posted April 8, 2009 Mr. Brent-banshee-whateverthefuck: You are either a deeply disturbed heterosexual' date=' or a self-hating homosexual. Because guess what? Homosexuality is not a choice. If it were, then I wouldn't be one. Let's be logical here, for just a monet - do you really think that if it WAS a choice, I would have chosen to grow up with a lifestyle that would result in my being ridiculed? No, had I choice in the matter, I would have chosen what was "Normal". If you are REALLY gay, then you simply hate yourself for it based on what I'm reading. And if you're not gay, but choose men anyway...well, I don't know what to say to that. =/ I ain't touching that. In any case, I DON'T hate myself. I'm happy with how I turned out. And for you to say that gay marriage is wrong, despite the fact that there is tons of real, scientific evidence to prove that people are born that way, makes you nothing but a close-minded idiot.[/quote'] He is gay, believe me. I saw his pics. So basically you say that you know everything about a person's personality, lifestyle, home, friends, family and sexual preference just by looking at his appearance? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ProjectClow Posted April 8, 2009 Report Share Posted April 8, 2009 well then hurry up. gay marrige->more openly gay guy->less competion for girls. and closeted gays are chick magnets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Emo~ Posted April 8, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 8, 2009 Mr. Brent-banshee-whateverthefuck: You are either a deeply disturbed heterosexual' date=' or a self-hating homosexual. Because guess what? Homosexuality is not a choice. If it were, then I wouldn't be one. Let's be logical here, for just a monet - do you really think that if it WAS a choice, I would have chosen to grow up with a lifestyle that would result in my being ridiculed? No, had I choice in the matter, I would have chosen what was "Normal". If you are REALLY gay, then you simply hate yourself for it based on what I'm reading. And if you're not gay, but choose men anyway...well, I don't know what to say to that. =/ I ain't touching that. In any case, I DON'T hate myself. I'm happy with how I turned out. And for you to say that gay marriage is wrong, despite the fact that there is tons of real, scientific evidence to prove that people are born that way, makes you nothing but a close-minded idiot.[/quote'] He is gay, believe me. I saw his pics. So basically you say that you know everything about a person's personality, lifestyle, home, friends, family and sexual preference just by looking at his appearance?Thats all i needed to see. I'll PM you them to prove it to you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zexaeon Posted April 8, 2009 Report Share Posted April 8, 2009 Gay guys in general are chick magnets, closeted or no. =/ I honestly don't understand it, either. I mean, there are some extremely insensitive gay guys who still attract girls. Weird. I don't act like a woman, but for whatever reason, they are still drawn to me. -.- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ProjectClow Posted April 8, 2009 Report Share Posted April 8, 2009 girls want what girls cant get. like little kids. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nitemare452 Posted April 8, 2009 Report Share Posted April 8, 2009 Mr. Brent-banshee-whateverthefuck: You are either a deeply disturbed heterosexual' date=' or a self-hating homosexual. Because guess what? Homosexuality is not a choice. If it were, then I wouldn't be one. Let's be logical here, for just a monet - do you really think that if it WAS a choice, I would have chosen to grow up with a lifestyle that would result in my being ridiculed? No, had I choice in the matter, I would have chosen what was "Normal". If you are REALLY gay, then you simply hate yourself for it based on what I'm reading. And if you're not gay, but choose men anyway...well, I don't know what to say to that. =/ I ain't touching that. In any case, I DON'T hate myself. I'm happy with how I turned out. And for you to say that gay marriage is wrong, despite the fact that there is tons of real, scientific evidence to prove that people are born that way, makes you nothing but a close-minded idiot.[/quote'] He is gay, believe me. I saw his pics. So basically you say that you know everything about a person's personality, lifestyle, home, friends, family and sexual preference just by looking at his appearance?Thats all i needed to see. I'll PM you them to prove it to you. Looks doesn't mean anything..I have tons of gay friends that still get hit on by girls...just looking at them you cant tell but even when you hear them talking you cant tell..I mean look at vin diesel, he is one mean looking guy and he is gay. Also I think gay people should be allowed to marry..Why shouldnt they be allowed to go through the same sheet that hetro couples do...Besides marriage is suppose to be about love and who says gays cant love just as much as straight people..so why cant they show it the same way? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silas Angel Posted April 8, 2009 Report Share Posted April 8, 2009 Mr. Brent-banshee-whateverthefuck: You are either a deeply disturbed heterosexual' date=' or a self-hating homosexual. Because guess what? Homosexuality is not a choice. If it were, then I wouldn't be one. Let's be logical here, for just a monet - do you really think that if it WAS a choice, I would have chosen to grow up with a lifestyle that would result in my being ridiculed? No, had I choice in the matter, I would have chosen what was "Normal". If you are REALLY gay, then you simply hate yourself for it based on what I'm reading. And if you're not gay, but choose men anyway...well, I don't know what to say to that. =/ I ain't touching that. In any case, I DON'T hate myself. I'm happy with how I turned out. And for you to say that gay marriage is wrong, despite the fact that there is tons of real, scientific evidence to prove that people are born that way, makes you nothing but a close-minded idiot. Another interesting note - the government has long since stood by the fact that matters of Religeon and Government are to be kept seperate. Marriage has become a very LEGAL procedure. How can people suddenly claim that it violates the sanctity of marriage, when marriage, being a legal thing, should no longer be a religeous issue? Also, for the record, I in fact am religeous. But that does not mean I mindlessly believe everything that the bible says. [b']The bible may have been written by God, but that doesn't mean it was ADAPTED over the countless ages by God. Man has transliterated, again and again, what the bible says for centuries.[/b] It's perfectly reasonable that things would be lost, skewed, or even deliberately changed, in translation. That's why I don't do Organized Religeon. Then read it in its original forms. Read the Old Testament in its Hebrew form and the New from its Greek form and you will find minor errors with translations available today: NIV, ESV, KJV, and the like. Get a Strong's Concordance and compare. There may be a few errors in the ESV, but another translation doesn't contain those errors. Overall, the Word of God has been protected by His hand over the centuries. God would not deceive His people. This is not the topic of this thread, so if you wish to continue this argument, PM me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zexaeon Posted April 8, 2009 Report Share Posted April 8, 2009 I have no need to Pm you, I have only to say what is true - there is no original form available anymore. All written accounts of the Bible that exist today have all been written by the hands of man. We no longer possess any of the original stone/papairus (or however you spell that) that the original scriptures would have been written on. God would not deceive his people. But people who think they're doing what God wants would. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PrometheusMFD Posted April 8, 2009 Report Share Posted April 8, 2009 I have no need to Pm you' date=' I have only to say what is true - there is no original form available anymore. All written accounts of the Bible that exist today have all been written by the hands of man. We no longer possess any of the original stone/papairus (or however you spell that) that the original scriptures would have been written on. God would not deceive his people. But people who think they're doing what God wants would.[/quote'] Finally! Someone who sees the modern bible as I do! In its essence, Homosexual Marriage being recognized by the state is irrelivent to anything anyone believes in. If the modern bible is right, then it is their souls. The only qualms I have about it is the way it is passed.1)It is usually passed through the judiciary branch as apposed to legislation like it should be (judges can't make laws, people)2)Adding it as an ammendment would be the only way for it to be successfull, due to the fact that every state must allow Gay Marriage in order for the system to work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nitemare452 Posted April 9, 2009 Report Share Posted April 9, 2009 I have no need to Pm you' date=' I have only to say what is true - there is no original form available anymore. All written accounts of the Bible that exist today have all been written by the hands of man. We no longer possess any of the original stone/papairus (or however you spell that) that the original scriptures would have been written on. God would not deceive his people. But people who think they're doing what God wants would.[/quote'] Excatly..Thats why I dont worship God..and if its so bad that homos marry and mate then its screwed because..It says we are all made in his image, so if I take his name in vain or if homos get together..it shouldnt matter because we are suppose to be a part of him..It also says man lies and the bible is translated by man and if men lie then isnt the bible one big lie? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Emo~ Posted April 9, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 9, 2009 I have no need to Pm you' date=' I have only to say what is true - there is no original form available anymore. All written accounts of the Bible that exist today have all been written by the hands of man. We no longer possess any of the original stone/papairus (or however you spell that) that the original scriptures would have been written on. God would not deceive his people. But people who think they're doing what God wants would.[/quote'] Excatly..Thats why I dont worship God..and if its so bad that homos marry and mate then its screwed because..It says we are all made in his image, so if I take his name in vain or if homos get together..it shouldnt matter because we are suppose to be a part of him..It also says man lies and the bible is translated by man and if men lie then isnt the bible one big lie?That is impossible. To mate you must try to conceive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Careless Whisper Posted April 9, 2009 Report Share Posted April 9, 2009 One Word: Disgusting!In the Bible' date=' it says that marriage is between one man and one woman.[/quote'] This topic got dumber when this was posted. Seriously? Look at the authors of the bible and how each of those idiots translated it. For all we know, the original intent of the bible could have been just to entertain instead of pass on some theory about an all mighty being who created the universe. In other words, WHO THE HELL CARES ABOUT WHAT THE BIBLE SAYS ANYMORE! Gays/Lesbians have as much freedom to get married as straight people do. Who ever says differently is a damn moron who needs to ask themselves this question. What benefit would we get if we restrict homosexual marriage? And don't say population increase, because that's just the dumbest thing anyone can say. We don't need anymore people to populate the earth, we have enough morons poluting it as it is. (exmple would be the American Government.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nitemare452 Posted April 9, 2009 Report Share Posted April 9, 2009 I have no need to Pm you' date=' I have only to say what is true - there is no original form available anymore. All written accounts of the Bible that exist today have all been written by the hands of man. We no longer possess any of the original stone/papairus (or however you spell that) that the original scriptures would have been written on. God would not deceive his people. But people who think they're doing what God wants would.[/quote'] Excatly..Thats why I dont worship God..and if its so bad that homos marry and mate then its screwed because..It says we are all made in his image, so if I take his name in vain or if homos get together..it shouldnt matter because we are suppose to be a part of him..It also says man lies and the bible is translated by man and if men lie then isnt the bible one big lie?That is impossible. To mate you must try to conceive. I said mate because I cant say funk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.