Azmodius Posted March 23, 2009 Report Share Posted March 23, 2009 Monsters: 213 x Destiny Hero Dogma2 x Caius the Shadow Monarch2 x Raiza the Storm Monarch 3 x Nimble Momonga3 x Giant Germ1 x Treeborn Frog2 x Destiny Hero Diamond Dude2 x Dekoichi 1 x Breaker the Magical Warrior1 x Stratos1 x Spirit Reaper Spells: 11 1 x Megamorph2 x Allure of Darkness2 x Destiny Draw2 x Trade In1 x Monster Reborn1 x MST1 x Lightning Vortex1 x Heavy Storm Traps: 8 3 x Solemn Judgment3 x Divine Wrath2 x Dark Bribe Probable fail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrystalFan Posted March 23, 2009 Report Share Posted March 23, 2009 Wats the strategy of the deck? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azmodius Posted March 23, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 23, 2009 Figure it out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skarlet Posted March 23, 2009 Report Share Posted March 23, 2009 interesting, but you really dont have enough targets for Diamond Dude, I understand that he's D-Draw fodder, but he's also kinda useless Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister Sir Posted March 23, 2009 Report Share Posted March 23, 2009 No Malicious? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guy person Posted March 24, 2009 Report Share Posted March 24, 2009 I LOL'd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted March 24, 2009 Report Share Posted March 24, 2009 I LOL'd. Is that because this Deck isn't a Twilight Deck and it's a Deck that would most likely do well in casual play? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guy person Posted March 24, 2009 Report Share Posted March 24, 2009 I LOL'd. Is that because this Deck isn't a Twilight Deck and it's a Deck that would most likely do well in casual play? No, I "LOL'd" because of the card choices and lack there of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azmodius Posted March 24, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 24, 2009 I LOL'd. Is that because this Deck isn't a Twilight Deck and it's a Deck that would most likely do well in casual play? No' date=' I "LOL'd" because of the card choices and lack there of.[/quote'] plzmaeksence Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guy person Posted March 24, 2009 Report Share Posted March 24, 2009 I LOL'd. Is that because this Deck isn't a Twilight Deck and it's a Deck that would most likely do well in casual play? No' date=' I "LOL'd" because of the card choices and lack there of.[/quote'] plzmaeksence plzlrn2english Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Docomodake Posted March 24, 2009 Report Share Posted March 24, 2009 I LOL'd. Is that because this Deck isn't a Twilight Deck and it's a Deck that would most likely do well in casual play? No' date=' I "LOL'd" because of the card choices and lack there of.[/quote'] plzmaeksence plzlrn2english A ha ha, hipocrisy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister Sir Posted March 24, 2009 Report Share Posted March 24, 2009 No Malicious? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted March 24, 2009 Report Share Posted March 24, 2009 Lack of Creature Swap maybe? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guy person Posted March 24, 2009 Report Share Posted March 24, 2009 I LOL'd. Is that because this Deck isn't a Twilight Deck and it's a Deck that would most likely do well in casual play? No' date=' I "LOL'd" because of the card choices and lack there of.[/quote'] plzmaeksence plzlrn2english A ha ha, hipocrisy. Hmm... I'm guessing this is all stemming from the "lack there of" part of my post. It is fairly understandable that you have not heard it used before as it is an older saying and rarely used now a days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted March 24, 2009 Report Share Posted March 24, 2009 Phantom Skyblaster? D-Hero Malicious? Surely you can do better than this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister Sir Posted March 24, 2009 Report Share Posted March 24, 2009 No Malicious?Phantom Skyblaster? D-Hero Malicious? Surely you can do better than this. *sigh* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted March 24, 2009 Report Share Posted March 24, 2009 No Malicious?Phantom Skyblaster? D-Hero Malicious? Surely you can do better than this. *sigh* The lack of them is very disappointing. They should both definately be in here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bunter Dwayne Posted March 24, 2009 Report Share Posted March 24, 2009 Mali, definitely. And, neg a Lightning Vortex for a Brain Control. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Docomodake Posted March 24, 2009 Report Share Posted March 24, 2009 I LOL'd. Is that because this Deck isn't a Twilight Deck and it's a Deck that would most likely do well in casual play? No' date=' I "LOL'd" because of the card choices and lack there of.[/quote'] plzmaeksence plzlrn2english A ha ha, hipocrisy. Hmm... I'm guessing this is all stemming from the "lack there of" part of my post. It is fairly understandable that you have not heard it used before as it is an older saying and rarely used now a days. No, but rather the use of internet dialect. I am fully aware that the statement "lack there of" is english and is correct grammar as I have read many books and posts from Crab Helmet stating such. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guy person Posted March 24, 2009 Report Share Posted March 24, 2009 I LOL'd. Is that because this Deck isn't a Twilight Deck and it's a Deck that would most likely do well in casual play? No' date=' I "LOL'd" because of the card choices and lack there of.[/quote'] plzmaeksence plzlrn2english A ha ha, hipocrisy. Hmm... I'm guessing this is all stemming from the "lack there of" part of my post. It is fairly understandable that you have not heard it used before as it is an older saying and rarely used now a days. No, but rather the use of internet dialect. I am fully aware that the statement "lack there of" is english and is correct grammar as I have read many books and posts from Crab Helmet stating such. So where is the problem? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.