guy person Posted March 22, 2009 Report Share Posted March 22, 2009 It seems that the dark side doesn't like me anymore... So I'm swearing myself to the light. 40 222x JD2x lyla3x lumina2x wulf1x garoth3x honest1x jain2x celestia1x ryko3x necro guardna1x PSZ1x ehren 143x recharge3x charge1x storm1x trunade1x reincarnation2x foolish1x reborn2x cold wave 41x TT2x beckoning light1x decree Generic extra deck Side: 15 2x secret village1x lyla1x breaker2x shadow imprisoning mirror2x malevolent catastrophe2x IIW (When I go to anything big, these will be replaced with 1 roar and one of something else I can't remember ATM.)1x brain2x roar1x gorz1x royal decree Rate and fix. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted March 22, 2009 Report Share Posted March 22, 2009 Where's your Solemn Judgment? That's what the cool kids are using these days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guy person Posted March 22, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 22, 2009 I don't really like solemn in LS.Edited. Bump. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted March 23, 2009 Report Share Posted March 23, 2009 Where's your Solemn Judgment? LS doesnt need it. At least from my experience. Im not too sure about Cold Wave in this. It just doesnt seem to work in LS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guy person Posted March 23, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 23, 2009 Where's your Solemn Judgment? LS doesnt need it. At least from my experience. Im not too sure about Cold Wave in this. It just doesnt seem to work in LS. It will keep JD safe from solemn's/pwwb's/BTH/karma cut/TT/ect. When he comes out and will allow me to blow up the field without having to worry. Edited again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bunter Dwayne Posted March 23, 2009 Report Share Posted March 23, 2009 Neg a Celestia, add a Garoth? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zaradon Posted March 23, 2009 Report Share Posted March 23, 2009 I think lyla, wulf and celestia is best at 3. Garoth is also good at 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guy person Posted March 23, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 23, 2009 I think lyla' date=' wulf and celestia is best at 3. Garoth is also good at 2.[/quote'] No to all of those. Garoth is ok at two but I want to keep this at 40 and since he is so seachable and usually only provides one draw you might as well just keep him at one to make the deck 40. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted March 23, 2009 Report Share Posted March 23, 2009 Wulf should be at three. You're running three Charge, three Recharge, and two Foolish Burial. One of my motto's: "There's no reason not to run three Wulf if you are running three Charge of the Light Brigade' date=' three Solar Recharge, and two Foolish Burial."[/color'] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guy person Posted March 24, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 24, 2009 No. and Bump it up! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spiff! Posted March 25, 2009 Report Share Posted March 25, 2009 I just thought how handy PSZ is in 'Sworns.Put Wulf on top of deck with 1 LS out.Free Goyo on your next turn, if PSZ survives. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted March 25, 2009 Report Share Posted March 25, 2009 2x IIW (When I go to anything big' date=' these will be replaced with 1 roar and one of something else I can't remember ATM)[/quote'] I would keep the IIWs sided. Macro Decks are a legitimate threat to LS. Siding them in means you win against them with little to no problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guy person Posted March 25, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 25, 2009 2x IIW (When I go to anything big' date=' these will be replaced with 1 roar and one of something else I can't remember ATM)[/quote'] I would keep the IIWs sided. Macro Decks are a legitimate threat to LS. Siding them in means you win against them with little to no problem. But how often are macro decks used in big play? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted March 25, 2009 Report Share Posted March 25, 2009 2x IIW (When I go to anything big' date=' these will be replaced with 1 roar and one of something else I can't remember ATM)[/quote'] I would keep the IIWs sided. Macro Decks are a legitimate threat to LS. Siding them in means you win against them with little to no problem. But how often are macro decks used in big play? Good point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted March 25, 2009 Report Share Posted March 25, 2009 2x IIW (When I go to anything big' date=' these will be replaced with 1 roar and one of something else I can't remember ATM)[/quote'] I would keep the IIWs sided. Macro Decks are a legitimate threat to LS. Siding them in means you win against them with little to no problem. But how often are macro decks used in big play? Good point. They're used enough (but since "big play" barely exists anymore, I'll assume you're talking about mass-dueling random fairly good YVD/DMU opponents or somethin'?), and considering how crippling Macro'd be, I encourage you to keep siding walls. ;) Besides, what else do you have to side against? Oppression and GBs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guy person Posted March 25, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 25, 2009 I might end up siding an outstanding dog for locals... The @sshole plays stall burn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guy person Posted March 26, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 26, 2009 Bump! This is what I have got from play testing so far: 1) I love Lightsworns. 2) All of the people saying wulf needs to be at three need to go suck an egg. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.