georgeyboy654 Posted October 1, 2007 Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 Monsters: 183 Cyber Dragon3 Mystic Tomato2 Don Zaloog1 Spirit Reaper2 D. D. Assailant2 Exiled Force1 Asura Priest1 Neo-Spacian Grand Mole1 Sangan1 D.D. Warrior Lady1 Breaker the Magical Warrior Spells: 141 Heavy Storm1 Mystical Space Typhoon1 Premature Burial1 Pot of Avarice2 Reinforcement of the Army1 Smashing Ground1 Fissure2 Nobleman of Crossout1 Scapegoat1 Shrink2 Creature Swap Traps: 81 Mirror Force1 Torrential Tribute1 Call of the Haunted2 Sakuretsu Armor1 Bottomless Trap Hole2 Dust Tornado suggestions/fixes welcome Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sartorius Posted October 1, 2007 Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 Oh. It's above average. Posted it on DGz yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
georgeyboy654 Posted October 1, 2007 Author Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 yep, so dont call this deck crap jabroni!! ;] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sartorius Posted October 1, 2007 Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 I didn't =/ Get ya eyes tested :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
georgeyboy654 Posted October 1, 2007 Author Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 lol, me know Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry OldMaster Posted October 1, 2007 Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 Go(o)d. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
georgeyboy654 Posted October 1, 2007 Author Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 god? excellent Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sartorius Posted October 1, 2007 Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 Nah. It's moderate at best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
georgeyboy654 Posted October 1, 2007 Author Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 u just saying that so people vote for u in the best deck, when clearly mine rocks ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sartorius Posted October 1, 2007 Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 But it doesn't. It's okay, yeah, but it could be tons better. You barely know anything about this new format. IMO this deck woulda fit in more the previous one. Deckbuilding is about research and then the practical application of what you know. Learn more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
georgeyboy654 Posted October 1, 2007 Author Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 meh, lol any fixes then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thegargoylevine Posted October 1, 2007 Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 -1 Scapegoat-1 Bottomless Trap Hole+1 Card Trooper+1 Snipe Hunter From the looks of it, I think a Rat Toolbox Works better, but it's really up to you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sartorius Posted October 2, 2007 Report Share Posted October 2, 2007 DECKLIST FROM SJC WASHINGTON DCJerome Baisey Monsters: 18 3 Cyber Dragon 3 Mystic Tomato 2 Don Zaloog 1 Spirit Reaper 2 D. D. Assailant 2 Exiled Force 1 Asura Priest 1 Neo-Spacian Grand Mole 1 Sangan 1 D.D. Warrior Lady 1 Breaker the Magical Warrior Spells: 14 1 Heavy Storm 1 Mystical Space Typhoon 1 Premature Burial 1 Pot of Avarice 2 Reinforcement of the Army 1 Smashing Ground 1 Fissure 2 Nobleman of Crossout 1 Scapegoat 1 Shrink 2 Creature Swap Traps: 8 1 Mirror Force 1 Torrential Tribute 1 Call of the Haunted 2 Sakuretsu Armor 1 Bottomless Trap Hole 2 Dust Tornado --- Yeah. Great job netdecking. If you were gonna do it, at least change the order of cards, lolololol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
georgeyboy654 Posted October 2, 2007 Author Report Share Posted October 2, 2007 david gave me this list............. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sartorius Posted October 2, 2007 Report Share Posted October 2, 2007 And there you were saying you made it your self etc. You've disgraced yourself again. 0/10 - Netdecking is bad. David is also Bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
georgeyboy654 Posted October 2, 2007 Author Report Share Posted October 2, 2007 And there you were saying you made it your self etc. You've disgraced yourself again. 0/10 - Netdecking is bad. David is also Bad. ive already told you, i didnt know it was a netdeck, david sent me this list, so i hardly see how ive "disgraced myself"........... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sartorius Posted October 2, 2007 Report Share Posted October 2, 2007 YOU SAID YOU MADE IT WHEN IT WAS NETDECKED BY SOMEONE ELSE THEN GAVE TO YOU... Which still means it's netdecked, LOL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
georgeyboy654 Posted October 2, 2007 Author Report Share Posted October 2, 2007 joe gives u decks, and it isnt netdecking now is it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sartorius Posted October 2, 2007 Report Share Posted October 2, 2007 Nope. It's called being a mate. A teammate. He fixes my decks, the team lends decks. It's hardly netdecking as we get permission to use them from who we borrow from. Anyway, what's happened has happen, I suggest you possibly PM Frunk to have this topic closed/deleted to stop any other possible flaming attempts or spam. (Just to be on the safe side) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibdo Posted October 2, 2007 Report Share Posted October 2, 2007 Urgh. This is all so childish. Just give George a break, sheesh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
georgeyboy654 Posted October 4, 2007 Author Report Share Posted October 4, 2007 thank you jeremy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sartorius Posted October 5, 2007 Report Share Posted October 5, 2007 He started it. -points- xDD It's cool. xD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
georgeyboy654 Posted October 5, 2007 Author Report Share Posted October 5, 2007 lulz..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.