GenzoTheHarpist Posted March 10, 2009 Report Share Posted March 10, 2009 Limit maybe? Stupid rookie. Not so dumb since you need 2 of these to perform the 1-card Summon Priest OTK. If it was limited, that OTK would not work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted March 10, 2009 Report Share Posted March 10, 2009 Limit maybe? Stupid rookie. Because SSing two of these' date=' attacking, then tributing themselves is an acceptable strategy. Stupid "a-lot-of-time-spent-here-for-absolutely-despising-this-place"y.[/quote'] Next you're going to be saying that anyone who doesn't think Chaos Emperor Dragon - Envoy of the End should be at 1 is stupid, on the grounds that it would obviously be a problem at 3. Limit maybe? Stupid rookie. Not so dumb since you need 2 of these to perform the 1-card Summon Priest OTK. If it was limited' date=' that OTK would not work.[/quote'] First of all, the 1-card OTK doesn't work without the core Cat/Airbellum combo, which is problematic even outside of this combo. Second of all, the 1-card OTK would still work with Power Tool Dragon if the deck contained any equips. Third of all, a 1-card combo that inflicts 7900 damage is unacceptable anyhow. So yeah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~/Coolio Prime\~ Posted March 10, 2009 Report Share Posted March 10, 2009 Limit maybe? Stupid rookie. Because SSing two of these' date=' attacking, then tributing themselves is an acceptable strategy. Stupid "a-lot-of-time-spent-here-for-absolutely-despising-this-place"y.[/quote'] Next you're going to be saying that anyone who doesn't think Chaos Emperor Dragon - Envoy of the End should be at 1 is stupid, on the grounds that it would obviously be a problem at 3.You think it's a problem at 1 then? Eludicate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted March 10, 2009 Report Share Posted March 10, 2009 Limit maybe? Stupid rookie. Because SSing two of these' date=' attacking, then tributing themselves is an acceptable strategy. Stupid "a-lot-of-time-spent-here-for-absolutely-despising-this-place"y.[/quote'] Next you're going to be saying that anyone who doesn't think Chaos Emperor Dragon - Envoy of the End should be at 1 is stupid, on the grounds that it would obviously be a problem at 3.You think it's a problem at 1 then? Eludicate. Well, it sends both players' hands and fields to the Graveyard while inflicting a ridiculous amount of burn, and has a joke of a Special Summoning condition. To be honest, I think the problems it poses even at 1 are fairly self-explanatory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted March 10, 2009 Report Share Posted March 10, 2009 Limit maybe? Stupid rookie. Because SSing two of these' date=' attacking, then tributing themselves is an acceptable strategy. Stupid "a-lot-of-time-spent-here-for-absolutely-despising-this-place"y.[/quote'] Someone works for Konami. Yes. I know how stupid Konami is. Limiting Synchros. Ban Airbellum and Dark Strike Fighter is not a problem what-so-ever. Konami will never do this so yeah. Thinking like Konami makes you look stupid so yeah. Dont think like Konami. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted March 10, 2009 Report Share Posted March 10, 2009 this card makes me not want to run solemn >.< Limit maybe? and im back at the top in all honesty there is no point in limiting this as you only need 1 to win!which then makes me think well ban itbut then its effect isnt really that bad, but then the lack of "once per turn" is what makes this fairly broke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Emo~ Posted March 10, 2009 Report Share Posted March 10, 2009 This + BP + Ultimate O = OTK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~/Coolio Prime\~ Posted March 10, 2009 Report Share Posted March 10, 2009 Okay, I thought Dark Strike Bomber tributed once per turn, I haven't seen the effect in a long time. Don't get your panties in a bunch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted March 10, 2009 Report Share Posted March 10, 2009 ---^ of course its only monsters you control!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! why the hell would it tribute your opponents??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~/Coolio Prime\~ Posted March 11, 2009 Report Share Posted March 11, 2009 Limit maybe? Stupid rookie. Because SSing two of these' date=' attacking, then tributing themselves is an acceptable strategy. Stupid "a-lot-of-time-spent-here-for-absolutely-despising-this-place"y.[/quote'] Next you're going to be saying that anyone who doesn't think Chaos Emperor Dragon - Envoy of the End should be at 1 is stupid, on the grounds that it would obviously be a problem at 3.You think it's a problem at 1 then? Eludicate. Well, it sends both players' hands and fields to the Graveyard while inflicting a ridiculous amount of burn, and has a joke of a Special Summoning condition. To be honest, I think the problems it poses even at 1 are fairly self-explanatory.Wait a second, in what regard does it send both players' hand and field to the graveyard? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted March 11, 2009 Report Share Posted March 11, 2009 LOL I WAS COMPLETELY WRONG DUE TO MY REFUSAL TO ACTUALLY READ THE CARD SO IMMA GONNA SAVE FACE BY MAKING COMPLETELY RANDOM ACCUSATIONS 'BOUT EVERYONE ELSE HERE BECAUSE FOR SOME REASON I AM UNDER THE DELUSION THAT THEY HAVE BECOME ANGRY OVER THIS DESPITE ALL EVIDENCE TO THE CONTRARY Am I getting warm? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~/Coolio Prime\~ Posted March 11, 2009 Report Share Posted March 11, 2009 LOL I WAS COMPLETELY WRONG DUE TO MY REFUSAL TO ACTUALLY READ THE CARD SO IMMA GONNA SAVE FACE BY MAKING COMPLETELY RANDOM ACCUSATIONS 'BOUT EVERYONE ELSE HERE BECAUSE FOR SOME REASON I AM UNDER THE DELUSION THAT THEY HAVE BECOME ANGRY OVER THIS DESPITE ALL EVIDENCE TO THE CONTRARY Am I getting warm?Close. I thought I remembered the card's effect, once per turn is a common addition to an effect. And I wouldn't really consider that my last sentence was a random accusation, don't get your panties in a bunch is a common phrase. I wasn't telling people not to be angry, just that I didn't need five people saying the same shady response. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Father Wolf Posted March 11, 2009 Report Share Posted March 11, 2009 LOL I WAS COMPLETELY WRONG DUE TO MY REFUSAL TO ACTUALLY READ THE CARD SO IMMA GONNA SAVE FACE BY MAKING COMPLETELY RANDOM ACCUSATIONS 'BOUT EVERYONE ELSE HERE BECAUSE FOR SOME REASON I AM UNDER THE DELUSION THAT THEY HAVE BECOME ANGRY OVER THIS DESPITE ALL EVIDENCE TO THE CONTRARY Am I getting warm? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted March 11, 2009 Report Share Posted March 11, 2009 LOL I WAS COMPLETELY WRONG DUE TO MY REFUSAL TO ACTUALLY READ THE CARD SO IMMA GONNA SAVE FACE BY MAKING COMPLETELY RANDOM ACCUSATIONS 'BOUT EVERYONE ELSE HERE BECAUSE FOR SOME REASON I AM UNDER THE DELUSION THAT THEY HAVE BECOME ANGRY OVER THIS DESPITE ALL EVIDENCE TO THE CONTRARY Am I getting warm?Close. I thought I remembered the card's effect' date=' once pert turn is a common addition to an effect. And I wouldn't really consider that my last sentence was a random accusation, don't get your panties in a bunch is a common phrase. I wasn't telling people not to be angry, just that I didn't need five people saying the same shady response.[/quote'] ..."shady"? LOL I WAS COMPLETELY WRONG DUE TO MY REFUSAL TO ACTUALLY READ THE CARD SO IMMA GONNA SAVE FACE BY MAKING COMPLETELY RANDOM ACCUSATIONS 'BOUT EVERYONE ELSE HERE BECAUSE FOR SOME REASON I AM UNDER THE DELUSION THAT THEY HAVE BECOME ANGRY OVER THIS DESPITE ALL EVIDENCE TO THE CONTRARY Am I getting warm? ACTUALLY I HOLD SHIFT DOWN WITH MY LEFT PINKY FINGER WHEN I TYPE IN ALL CAPS BECAUSE I FIND THAT FAR MORE COMFORTABLE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~/Coolio Prime\~ Posted March 11, 2009 Report Share Posted March 11, 2009 http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=shady Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.